Malta: Recent developments regarding fringe benefits

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Malta: Recent developments regarding fringe benefits

intl-updates-small.jpg
Galea-Salomone-Mark-100

Vella

Mark Galea

Salomone

Donald

Vella

In August 2017, the Fringe Benefits (Amendment) Rules were passed, by virtue of which important amendments were made to the fringe benefit rules in Malta to more closely reflect the current reality of cross-border employment.

In terms of Maltese income tax legislation, fringe benefits are benefits provided or deemed to be provided by reason of employment or office, regardless of whether they are received in cash or in kind and whether they are received in terms of the normal conditions of a contract of service or by way of a special or ex-gratia allowance.

The most pertinent introduction to the fringe benefit rules relates to tax jurisdiction. Where a fringe benefit is deemed to arise, the income represented by the value of that benefit is deemed to arise in the country where the services are wholly or principally performed. Therefore, if an employee is granted a benefit, such as free accommodation in Malta, but the activities relating to such employment are carried on outside of Malta, such income is to be treated as foreign source income for Maltese income tax purposes. Moreover, with respect to benefits arising from directorships, the amendment rules also clarify that such benefits are deemed to arise in the country where the company is managed and controlled.

The amendment rules also amend the calculation of the taxable value of certain benefits, such as those relating to the use of cars and the use of property. With respect to the taxable benefit of the private use of a car with a value not exceeding €16,310 ($20,000), the percentage of private use of the car has been reduced from 20% to 0%, provided that the vehicle is used wholly or mainly for point-to-point services by an employee who is a salesman or a support person in the performance of his duties. The taxable benefit of the use of immovable property, on the other hand, is to be determined by calculating 5% of the higher of the market value and the cost of the property. Moreover, where a shareholder resides in a property owned by a company, the amendment rules provide that such provision of accommodation should not constitute a fringe benefit, provided that a set of conditions are satisfied.

Share award schemes are deemed to be provided on each date that shares are issued or transferred to the beneficiary, and the value of such a benefit is to be calculated as the excess of the price which the shares would fetch if sold on the open market on the date when the benefit is provided over the price paid/payable by the beneficiary for those shares. The amendment rules now state that the benefit is to constitute separate chargeable income and be subject to tax at 15%.

The above amendments sit alongside a number of other amendments which have each been made with the intention of clarifying, supplementing and updating the fringe benefit rules.

Mark Galea Salomone (mark.galeasalomone@camilleripreziosi.com) and Donald Vella (donald.vella@camilleripreziosi.com)

Camilleri Preziosi

Tel: +356 21238989

Website: www.camilleripreziosi.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Holland & Knight, Nelson Mullins and McCarter & English made the joint-most tax partner hires in the US last year, according to annual ITR Talent Tracker data
Despite a three-year-high in tax revenues generated from settling TP cases, HMRC reported a sharp fall in resolved MAP disputes
Inflexion’s proposed minority stake in Baker Tilly Netherlands could propel the firm in the Dutch market, CEO Ronald Hoeksel tells ITR
While the US’s dramatic exit from the OECD’s global tax deal naturally grabbed headlines, Trump’s premeditated move shouldn’t detract from pillar two’s lofty ambitions
The ‘big four’ firm’s audit of gambling company Entain is under the spotlight; in other news, Ireland shrugs off Trump’s rejection of pillar two
Mid-market European private equity house Inflexion, which also backs law firm DWF, has agreed to acquire a minority stake in the Dutch tax advisory firm
Donald Trump’s inauguration, pillar two, APAs and TP were all up for discussion as ITR spoke to Baker McKenzie’s two newly minted US partners
In-house teams that want a balance of internal control and external expertise for pillar two should seriously consider co-sourcing models, Russell Gammon of Tax Systems argues
The OECD has vowed to continue working with the US despite the president effectively pulling the country out of the organisation’s global minimum tax deal
Norton Rose Fulbright highlights a Brazilian investment fund as a practical example of how new Dutch tax rules will require significant attention from foreign companies
Gift this article