China: China’s VAT zero-rating concession for exported service scope expanded

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China: China’s VAT zero-rating concession for exported service scope expanded

ho-khoonming.jpg
lu-lewis.jpg

Khoonming Ho

Lewis Lu

On October 30 2015 China's Ministry of Finance (MoF) and State Administration of Taxation jointly issued Circular Caishui [2015] 118 (Circular 118) which introduces value added tax (VAT) zero-rating for certain exported services, to replace the existing VAT exemption treatment. VAT zero-rating means that a taxpayer not only does not pay VAT on the services it performs, but is also entitled to full input VAT credits (and if applicable, refunds) for the expenses it incurs which relate to providing those services.

The three categories of services affected by the new VAT zero-rating treatment comprise:

1) offshore outsourcing services (consisting of information technology outsourcing (ITO) services, technical business process outsourcing (BPO) services and technical knowledge process outsourcing (KPO) services);

2) radio, television and film production and publishing services; and

3) technology transfers, software services, circuit design and testing services, information system services, business process management services and energy management services (except where the object of the energy management contract is located in mainland China) provided to overseas entities.

Circular 118 will be greeted favourably by taxpayers, and marks a further shift in China's VAT system conforming with international norms. According to the OECD's 'International VAT/GST Guidelines' (April 2014), exports should "not be subject to tax with a refund of input taxes" (that is, zero-rating should apply). The MoF has recently indicated its objective is for zero-rating to apply to all exported services. It is therefore expected that this change merely represents the first stage in that shift, though Circular 118 is silent on the timeline for any further changes.

Until now, the categories of zero-rated services in China have been relatively limited for exported services – it has only applied to research and development, design services and certain international transportation services. Circular 118 now expands the scope of zero-rated exported services, which means that taxpayers can claim related input VAT credits (and refunds, where applicable) on those services, when previously such input VAT credits were required to be denied or transferred out.

Khoonming Ho (khoonming.ho@kpmg.com)

KPMG, China and Hong Kong SAR

Tel: +86 (10) 8508 7082

Lewis Lu (lewis.lu@kpmg.com)

KPMG, Central China

Tel: +86 (21) 2212 3421

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The OECD has vowed to continue working with the US despite the president effectively pulling the country out of the organisation’s global minimum tax deal
Norton Rose Fulbright highlights a Brazilian investment fund as a practical example of how new Dutch tax rules will require significant attention from foreign companies
Thomson Reuters now has ‘end-to-end capability’ for its tax workflow business, according to its president for tax accounting and audit professionals
Patrick O’Gara, who is rated as a ‘highly regarded practitioner’ by World Tax, had spent over 20 years at Baker McKenzie
If approved, it would become the first ‘big four’ firm to practise law in the US; in other news, Morrison Foerster hired a new global tax co-chair
The ‘birth date’ of the service, which will collect tariffs, duties and other foreign revenue, will be January 20
Awards
Submit your nominations to this year's WIBL Americas Awards by February 28
Awards
Research for the annual Women in Business Law Awards has begun – submit your entries by February 28
In-house counsel across a number of regions are unimpressed with their tax advisers’ CSR efforts, according to ITR+ research
Firms are starkly divided on the benefits of specialist tax litigation teams over generalist practices, ITR’s analysis also finds
Gift this article