EU: 2016: The year of EU corporate tax reform and fiscal transparency?

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EU: 2016: The year of EU corporate tax reform and fiscal transparency?

made.jpg

Bob van der Made

On January 11 2016, EU Tax Commissioner Moscovici told Members of the European Parliament that: "2016 should be the year of corporate tax reform and fiscal transparency".

Indeed, direct tax policy-making is expected to be a very hot topic in 2016 for multinational companies doing business in Europe, within the context of:

  • Implementation in national legislation of the OECD BEPS recommendations agreed in October 2015 and further BEPS work in 2016;

  • The European Commission's legislative and non-legislative initiatives against 'aggressive' tax planning, tax avoidance and tax evasion, in the framework of its March 18 2015 EU Transparency Package, its complementary June 17 2015 EU Action Plan for Fair and Effective Taxation, and its expected January 27 2016 EU anti-corporate tax avoidance package including proposals for the conversion of the BEPS recommendations into EU law (a proposed new EU 'Anti-BEPS Directive') and a coordinated approach to implementing good tax governance standards internationally;

  • The EU fiscal state aid investigations on the use of tax rulings concerning the application of the transfer pricing rules and the arm's-length standard. It is noteworthy that the Commission in its press release on its final state aid decision on the Belgian excess profits tax rulings system has hinted that CCCTB and the 'Anti-BEPS Directive' are in some way connected with these investigations;

  • The temporary Dutch EU Council Presidency (first six months of 2016) has stated that it will prioritise action on tax evasion and tax avoidance;

  • The political and legislative follow-up at EU level to the ongoing work of the EU Parliament's Special Committee on Tax Rulings and the (standing) ECON Committee;

  • Reform of the EU Code of Conduct Group (business taxation); and

  • Anticipated new proposals for a mandatory joint EU Transparency Register of the EU Parliament, Commission and also the Council.

Corporates and financial institutions will do well to actively monitor the many politics-driven activities by the EU and OECD, but also the G8/G20 and even the UN, in the year ahead.

Bob van der Made (bob.van.der.made@nl.pwc.com)

PwC EU Public Affairs-Brussels

Tel: +31 88 792 3696

Website: www.pwc.com/eudtg

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Hotel La Tour had argued that VAT should be recoverable as a result of proceeds being used for a taxable business activity
Tax professionals are still going to be needed, but AI will make it easier than starting from zero, EY’s global tax disputes leader Luis Coronado tells ITR
AI and assisting clients with navigating global tax reform contributed to the uptick in turnover, the firm said
In a post on X, Scott Bessent urged dissenting countries to the US/OECD side-by-side arrangement to ‘join the consensus’ to get a deal over the line
Gift this article