China: China’s 150% super deduction regulation

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China: China’s 150% super deduction regulation

ho-khoonming.jpg
lu-lewis.jpg

Khoonming Ho

Lewis Lu

On December 29 2015, the State Administration of Taxation released Announcement [2015] No 97 (Announcement 97) to provide more detailed implementation standards in respect of Cai Shui [2015] No119 (Circular 119) which is the most important regulatory change to the R&D super deduction in years.

The key implementation standards of Announcement 97 can be summarised in the following aspects:

Enhance and limit the scope of claimable activities and expenses

  • R&D staff, technical staff and supporting staff can be involved as R&D personnel, while logistics staff are excluded from the R&D activity loop if they are not directly involved in R&D activities and cannot be claimed under the 150% super deduction.

  • The eligible depreciation expense related to equipment or devices used for R&D activities can be claimed for super deduction purposes if the accounting treatment has been followed, and in such a case the relevant depreciation amount is to be capped at the allowable amount deductible from a tax perspective.

  • Companies need to record and track the usage and activity information for relevant equipment, intangible assets and personnel not fully engaged in the R&D activity.

  • The calculation method to determine upper limit of 'other related R&D expenses'.

  • Any income/revenue gained from selling scraps, faulty, trial products and so on shall be used to offset the eligible R&D expense for super deduction purpose.

  • The material cost related to the R&D activities whose output results in 'final products' or parts of final products shall not be counted as an eligible R&D expense.

  • Items shall not be claimed as eligible expense for R&D super deduction purpose.

  • Super deduction criteria for entrusted R&D projects.

  • Whether the company falls into the negative list of industries depends on its principal business.

Compliance documentation requirements

  • Auxiliary accounts for R&D expenses shall be established for later validation when the R&D projects are set up.

  • Validation/audit review will be carried out after the annual corporate income tax filing period which will cover 20% of all R&D super deduction applications.

The rapid release of regulatory announcements by Premier Li Keqiang's government authorities in respect of the 150% super deduction in the past three months reflects the government's focus on supporting Chinese companies to develop new knowledge and improve products and processes.

Circular 119 enhances the existing R&D incentive programme and should help China achieve its economic growth objectives if the local tax authorities adopt a fair and reasonable approach to compliance documentation. Announcement 97 clarifies some points of uncertainty associated with Circular 119, especially in relation to the effective date of the new provisions and around the scope of eligible activities and expenses.

Khoonming Ho (khoonming.ho@kpmg.com)

KPMG, China and Hong Kong SAR

Tel: +86 (10) 8508 7082

Lewis Lu (lewis.lu@kpmg.com)

KPMG, Central China

Tel: +86 (21) 2212 3421

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

New research, which suggests LLMs can silently corrupt complex documents, should alert tax and legal teams relying on AI to handle iterative drafting and compliance workflows
Maintaining increased funding for HMRC is a ‘high possibility’ if he becomes PM, ITR has also heard
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2026 Europe Tax Awards
The firm has hired a team of private client lawyers from Withers to launch in New York and Connecticut, though ITR analysis suggests it faces stiff competition
The ability of tax authorities to receive and analyse data is becoming ‘quite advanced’, warns Stuart Lang, head of EY’s compliance co-sourcing solution
The Court of Appeal ruling clarifies that treaty benefits are not abusive where transactions are commercially driven, providing greater certainty on “main purpose” anti-avoidance tests
Despite the Netherlands featuring an unusual concentration of World Tax-ranked technology-led providers, sources believe there’s a long way to go to challenge the established players
Ethics seems to be playing a subservient role to an entitlement culture borne out of a pervasive ‘revenue at all costs’ mentality at the big four
Historical World Tax data suggests the ‘largest law firm merger in history’ may not pose a serious threat to the world's leading tax practices
The repeal of Libya’s statute of limitations and tougher enforcement leave taxpayers navigating a high-stakes choice between conciliation and litigation
Gift this article