Germany: Treaty override declared constitutional

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Treaty override declared constitutional

Linn
Braun

Alexander Linn

Thorsten Braun

In a decision dated December 15 2015 (and published on February 12 2016), Germany's constitutional court (BVerfG) confirmed that the legislature can enact tax treaty override provisions that aim to secure Germany's taxation rights, despite treaty provisions to the contrary.

Tax treaties in Germany are not 'self-executing'. For a tax treaty to become applicable, it must be transposed into German domestic law, which requires the consent of both the upper and lower houses of parliament. Once transposed, a treaty will have equal status with 'ordinary' domestic tax law; in other words, the treaty will not supersede ordinary domestic law, or vice versa. Despite this equality of status, there was some discussion in German literature if the constitution, interpreted in consideration of international law, could prevent the legislator from overriding a tax treaty, at least in specific circumstances. The federal tax court (BFH) referred a case to the constitutional court in 2014, where a domestic rule denied a taxpayer the exemption from German tax foreseen under the applicable tax treaty if the taxpayer failed to provide proof that the other state either did actually tax the relevant (employment) income or voluntarily waived its right to tax such income.

In its decision, the constitutional court makes a detailed analysis of the relationship between tax treaties and ordinary domestic law and concludes that tax treaties do not rank superior to ordinary domestic law. For ordinary domestic law, however, the lex posterior derogat legi priori principle (a later law prevails over an earlier law) applies, which means that the legislator can unilaterally introduce rules that deviate from earlier provisions in a tax treaty. Several other cases with other treaty overriding provisions are pending and the BVerfG is expected to come to similar conclusions, highlighting the need to consider domestic tax law of Germany as a treaty partner.

Alexander Linn (allinn@deloitte.de) and Thorsten Braun (tbraun@deloitte.de)

Deloitte

Tel: +49 89 29036 8558 and +49 69 75695 6444

Website: www.deloitte.de

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s most interesting stories of the year covered ‘landmark’ legal battles, pillar two, AI’s relationship with transfer pricing and more
Chinwe Odimba-Chapman was announced as Michael Bates’ successor; in other news, a report has found a high level of BEPS compliance among OECD jurisdictions
The tool, which will automatically compute amount B returns, requires “only minimal data inputs”, according to the OECD
The rules are intended to implement the substance of an earlier OECD report in its entirety
While new technology won’t replace the human touch, it could help relieve companies’ staffing issues, EY’s David Helmer and Daren Campbell tell ITR
The firm said the financial growth came from increased demand for its AI services and global tax reform advice
Chrystia Freeland had also been the figurehead of Canada’s controversial digital services tax adoption, which stoked economic tensions with the US
Panama has no official position on pillar two so far and a move to implement in Costa Rica will face rejection, experts tell ITR
The KPMG partner tells ITR about Sri Lanka’s complex and evolving tax landscape, setting legal precedents through client work, and his vision for the future of tax
Overall turnover at the firm also reached a record £8 billion; in other news, Ashurst and Dentons announced senior tax partner hires
Gift this article