Canada: Federal Court of Appeal agrees with TDL on scope of Canadian interest deductibility purpose test

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Canada: Federal Court of Appeal agrees with TDL on scope of Canadian interest deductibility purpose test

Leopardi
Carbone

John Leopardi

Alexandra Carbone

In March, the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) overturned the Tax Court of Canada (TCC) judgment in The TDL Group Co. (TDL). The FCA allowed the interest deduction claimed by TDL on funds borrowed from its direct US parent, Delcan, that were used to purchase additional common shares of its wholly-owned subsidiary, Tim Donut US Limited (Tim US). A summary of the TCC decision was published on March 30 2015.

Wendy's International (Wendy's), a US company, made an interest-bearing loan to Delcan and, in turn, Delcan made an interest-bearing loan to TDL. TDL used the borrowed funds to subscribe for additional common shares of Tim US. The next day, Tim US used the subscription funds to make an interest-free loan to Wendy's, which was replaced with an interest-bearing loan seven months later. The Minister of National Revenue (the Minister) denied the interest deduction claimed by TDL for the seven month period, but not for the subsequent period.

The principal issue in TDL was whether the subscription for common shares of Tim US met one of the requirements under Canadian interest deductibility rules, namely that the borrowed money be used for the purpose of earning non-exempt income from a business or property.

In reversing the TCC's decision, the FCA stated that it was settled law that the purpose for which the borrowed funds were used was to be determined at the time TDL subscribed for shares of Tim US. In the FCA's opinion, the TCC erred when it considered that a reasonable expectation of income from the shares in the first seven months of ownership was required in order to meet the purpose test. The FCA effectively reasoned that because the Minister accepted that the purpose test was met after the seven month period, it must have been met at the time of the share subscription. Strangely, the FCA did not undertake its own analysis of whether the purpose test was met at any time. The FCA also commented that the TCC's concern with tax avoidance in this case led it to the wrong conclusion.

The FCA's decision is welcome and in line with common understanding of the application of Canadian interest deductibility rules. In general, it is the original purpose of a particular use of borrowed funds that should be considered in applying the purpose test and not an ongoing examination of the purpose of a particular investment.

John Leopardi (john.leopardi@blakes.com) and Alexandra Carbone (alexandra.carbone@blakes.com), Montréal

Blake, Cassels & Graydon

Tel: +1 (514) 982 5030 and +1 (514) 982 5034

Website: www.blakes.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The levies extended beyond the president’s ‘legitimate reach’, the Supreme Court ruled
While Brazil’s consumption tax overhaul led to a short-term spike in tax advisory demand, we are now in a period of ‘normalisation’ marked by decreased recruitment
The expanded firm will comprise roughly 8,500 employees, including 550 partners; in other news, Paul Hastings and Macfarlanes made senior tax hires
Meanwhile, one expert highlights the importance of separating Venezuela’s tax authority from direct political control after ‘lost decades and isolation’
With PMK 108, Indonesia has upgraded its tax transparency regime for the digital era, focusing on data quality, governance, and cross border exchange rather than expanding regulatory reach
In a popular LinkedIn post, Jeremie Beitel encouraged firms to invest in junior talent even if it doesn’t lead to their loyalty, though recruiters offered ITR a mixed assessment
Advisers who do not register for the new regime in time could be prevented from interacting with HMRC, the tax authority said
Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
Gift this article