China: China’s new VAT rates and rules across all industries

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China: China’s new VAT rates and rules across all industries

ho-khoonming.jpg
lu-lewis.jpg

Khoonming Ho

Lewis Lu

On March 24 2016, China's Ministry of Finance and the State Administration of Taxation jointly issued Circular Cai Shui [2016] 36 (Circular 36) which contains the Value Added Tax (VAT) rates and rules applicable to the expansion of China's VAT system to several key sectors such as real estate and construction, financial services, and lifestyle services, which take effect from May 1 2016.

China's indirect tax system has, for many years now, been a bifurcated system with VAT broadly applying to the goods sectors, and Business Tax (BT) applying to the services sectors. Given that BT is essentially a tax on business which cascades throughout a supply chain, and is generally regarded as being an inefficient form of taxation, the Chinese government has been embarking upon a programme of progressively replacing BT with VAT since 2012. While the early stage of the VAT reform programme involved the VAT rules for certain sectors being implemented progressively on a province-by-province basis, in more recent times the implementation of VAT has been done nationwide on an industry-by-industry basis.

This final stage represents a 'big bang' approach, with all remaining sectors transitioning from BT to VAT nationwide with effect from May 1 2016, and they are:

  • Real estate and construction;

  • Financial services; and

  • Lifestyle services, which encompasses hospitality, food and beverage, healthcare, education, cultural and entertainment services, and a general residual category of any other services which are still subject to BT.

These three key industries represent, in policy terms, the most difficult industries to apply a VAT to, and moreover, in financial terms they are the most significant industries contributing to local government revenues. From a policy perspective, they can present challenges in applying a VAT to their services, given that:

  • the value added in financial services can be difficult to measure on a transaction-by-transaction basis, which explains why most countries exempt them from a VAT;

  • gains from real estate transactions may arise from passive activity (that is, simple increases in property values), or from actively improving the property, such as building and construction. The real estate industry also affects a broad range of stakeholders, from experienced developers, to investors, to speculators and private individuals. It is also subject to many other types of taxation already; and

  • lifestyle services can be consumed for business purposes or for private purposes, and differentiating between them can be difficult. In many cases they are also primarily cash based businesses where tax compliance may not be high.

When fully implemented, China's VAT system will be one of the broadest-based systems among more than 160 countries in the world which have now implemented a VAT (or equivalent tax). China's VAT system will be unique by international standards in applying VAT to virtually all financial services (including interest income), and in applying VAT to real estate transactions involving not only B2B and B2C transactions, but C2C as well – an outcome not known to exist in any other country. It would not be surprising to see other governments follow China's lead and expand their VAT systems, especially if China is able to implement these changes successfully.

For more insight into the BT2VAT initiative, visit www.internationaltaxreview.com for information put together for ITR by the Chinese SAT and Minister Wang Jun.

Khoonming Ho (khoonming.ho@kpmg.com) and Lewis Lu (lewis.lu@kpmg.com)

KPMG China

Tel: +86 (10) 8508 7082 and +86 (21) 2212 3421

Website: www.kpmg.com/cn

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
The US president also unveiled a new 50% levy on copper imports; in other news, a UK wealth tax proposal has been criticised by the Institute for Fiscal Studies
Wim Wuyts, who had been head of the specialist tax network since 2017, is moving on to a new role with WTS’s Belgian member firm
MNEs are increasingly using algorithmic tools in TP. Sahasranshu Dash argues that data ethics should therefore plug directly into the TP design process
The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales also queried whether HMRC resources could be better spent scrutinising larger entities
Grant Thornton’s Austria tax head likens his practice to an escape room, shares his football coaching ambitions, and explains why tax is cool
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 EMEA Tax Awards
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Asia-Pacific Tax Awards
The fates of pillars one and two hang in the balance after the US successfully threw its weight around in G7 and Canadian negotiations
Gift this article