Germany: Domestic tax law provisions and Brexit

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Domestic tax law provisions and Brexit

Linn-Alexander
Braun

Alexander Linn

Thorsten Braun

German companies need to rely on EU law to distribute dividends to UK parent companies free of withholding tax. One obvious consequence of the Brexit would be that EU law, such as the Parent-Subsidiary Directive, would no longer apply. For German entities, this would mean increased withholding tax on dividends paid to UK holding entities since the Germany-UK tax treaty only reduces the rate to 5%.

It should also be noted that German domestic tax law includes references to EU and European Economic Area (EEA) residence. For example, UK subsidiaries earning interest income would potentially be subject to German controlled foreign company (CFC) rules post-Brexit, while they could rely on a substance-test exemption from the rules as long as they are an EU/EEA resident.

Dividends received from UK subsidiaries by German entities will also have to meet certain criteria regarding the activities of the distributing entity to qualify for the dividend exemption from German trade tax. Certain restructurings, such as a hive-down of a German branch of a UK entity into a subsidiary would no longer qualify for rollover relief post-Brexit. There are discussions around potential violations of certain lock-in periods by the mere fact that UK would cease to be an EU member state, e.g. where exit taxes have been deferred in the past, or for a hive-down with a UK entity contributing a branch relying on the rollover relief.

Although the UK will not depart the EU immediately as a result of the June 23 2016 vote to leave the EU, political discussions suggest that the notification to leave under Article 50 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union will be delivered in early 2017. This would trigger a negotiation period of two years, after which (unless extended based on unanimous consent of all EU member states) the UK would be independent of the EU. Taxpayers will need to monitor developments and the negotiations after Article 50 has been triggered by the UK. The developments could potentially require companies to amend existing structures within the two-year period to be prepared for the post-Brexit world.

Alexander Linn (allinn@deloitte.de) and Thorsten Braun (tbraun@deloitte.de)

Deloitte

Tel: +49 89 29036 8558 and +49 69 75695 6444

Website: www.deloitte.de

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

One expert argues the ERS would be unlikely to improve taxpayers’ experience unless it comes with additional funding to hire more agents and staff
From pillar two and amount B to Apple’s headline EU Commission dispute, Martin Bonner and Yiwen Ping of Kreston Global argue that 2024’s key TP developments will inform 2025
Holland & Knight, Nelson Mullins and McCarter & English made the joint-most tax partner hires in the US last year, according to annual ITR Talent Tracker data
Despite a three-year-high in tax revenues generated from settling TP cases, HMRC reported a sharp fall in resolved MAP disputes
Inflexion’s proposed minority stake in Baker Tilly Netherlands could propel the firm in the Dutch market, CEO Ronald Hoeksel tells ITR
While the US’s dramatic exit from the OECD’s global tax deal naturally grabbed headlines, Trump’s premeditated move shouldn’t detract from pillar two’s lofty ambitions
The ‘big four’ firm’s audit of gambling company Entain is under the spotlight; in other news, Ireland shrugs off Trump’s rejection of pillar two
Mid-market European private equity house Inflexion, which also backs law firm DWF, has agreed to acquire a minority stake in the Dutch tax advisory firm
Donald Trump’s inauguration, pillar two, APAs and TP were all up for discussion as ITR spoke to Baker McKenzie’s two newly minted US partners
In-house teams that want a balance of internal control and external expertise for pillar two should seriously consider co-sourcing models, Russell Gammon of Tax Systems argues
Gift this article