US Outbound: Final country-by-country reporting regulations issued

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US Outbound: Final country-by-country reporting regulations issued

foley.jpg
taheri.jpg

Sean Foley

Cameron
Taheri

The US Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released final regulations on June 29, requiring annual country-by-country reporting (CbCR) by certain US taxpayers that are the ultimate parent entity of a multinational enterprise group with an annual revenue for the preceding annual accounting period of $850 million or more.

Published in the Federal Register, final regulations (T.D. 9773), Reg. section 1.6038-4, are effective as of June 30 2016.

These regulations intend to conform US income tax reporting rules to recommendations adopted by the OECD in October 2015 under Action 13 of its BEPS package.

Final regulations

The final regulations amend the rules proposed in December 2015 to reflect the official number of the required form – Form 8975, Country-by-Country Report.

Entities

With regards to entities required to file CbC reports, the final regulations maintain the definition of constituent entity proposed in the December draft regulations, making it clear that reporting is not required for foreign corporations or foreign partnerships for which the ultimate parent entity is not required to furnish information under section 6038(a).

However, the final regulations do modify the reference to a permanent establishment in the definition of business entity for greater clarity and consistency with the intended meaning of the OECD BEPS final report.

Partnerships and stateless entities

The final regulations state that the tax jurisdiction of residence information with respect to stateless entities is provided on an aggregate basis for all stateless entities in a US MNE group. In addition, each stateless entity-owner's share of the revenue and profit of its stateless entity should also be included in the information for the tax jurisdiction of residence of the stateless entity-owner. This rule applies whether or not the stateless entity-owner is liable to tax on its share of the stateless entity's income in the owner's tax jurisdiction of residence.

Definitions

The final regulations also clarify the term revenue, making it clear that that distributions from a partnership to a partner are not included in the partner's revenue. Likewise, the final regulations provide that remittances from a permanent establishment to its constituent entity-owner are not included in the constituent entity owner's revenue. Imputed earnings and deemed dividends that are taken into account solely for tax purposes are also generally excluded from the term "revenue".

The final regulations specifically exclude intangibles or financial assets from the term "tangible assets", putting the definition in line with the OECD CbCR rules.

Effective date and filing requirements

Other countries have adopted CbCR requirements for annual accounting periods beginning on or after January 1 2016, which would require information to be submitted by constituent entities of MNE groups with an ultimate parent entity resident in a tax jurisdiction that does not have a CbCR requirement for the same annual accounting period.

While the US final regulations are not applicable for tax years of ultimate parent entities beginning before June 30 2016, the IRS and Treasury intend to allow ultimate parent entities of US MNE groups and US business entities designated by a US territory ultimate parent entity to file CbC reports for reporting periods that begin on or after January 1 2016, but before the applicability date of the final regulations. This is possible under a procedure to be provided in separate, forthcoming guidance.

In general, Form 8975 must be filed with the ultimate parent entity's income tax return for the tax year in or with which the reporting period ends. Furthermore, the regulation's preamble indicates that penalty rules under section 6038 apply to Form 8975, including reasonable cause relief for failure to file.

Businesses should consult with their tax advisers to ensure compliance with the reporting requirements.

Sean Foley (sffoley@kpmg.com) and Cameron Taheri (ctaheri@kpmg.com), Washington, D.C.

KPMG LLP

Tel: +1 202 533 5588

Fax: +1 202 533 3384

Website: www.us.kpmg.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

One expert argues the ERS would be unlikely to improve taxpayers’ experience unless it comes with additional funding to hire more agents and staff
From pillar two and amount B to Apple’s headline EU Commission dispute, Martin Bonner and Yiwen Ping of Kreston Global argue that 2024’s key TP developments will inform 2025
Holland & Knight, Nelson Mullins and McCarter & English made the joint-most tax partner hires in the US last year, according to annual ITR Talent Tracker data
Despite a three-year-high in tax revenues generated from settling TP cases, HMRC reported a sharp fall in resolved MAP disputes
Inflexion’s proposed minority stake in Baker Tilly Netherlands could propel the firm in the Dutch market, CEO Ronald Hoeksel tells ITR
While the US’s dramatic exit from the OECD’s global tax deal naturally grabbed headlines, Trump’s premeditated move shouldn’t detract from pillar two’s lofty ambitions
The ‘big four’ firm’s audit of gambling company Entain is under the spotlight; in other news, Ireland shrugs off Trump’s rejection of pillar two
Mid-market European private equity house Inflexion, which also backs law firm DWF, has agreed to acquire a minority stake in the Dutch tax advisory firm
Donald Trump’s inauguration, pillar two, APAs and TP were all up for discussion as ITR spoke to Baker McKenzie’s two newly minted US partners
In-house teams that want a balance of internal control and external expertise for pillar two should seriously consider co-sourcing models, Russell Gammon of Tax Systems argues
Gift this article