Croatia: Croatian transfer pricing regulations

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Croatia: Croatian transfer pricing regulations

intl-updates-small.jpg

Although Croatia is not an OECD member country, the provisions of the relevant Croatian tax legislation are generally based on the OECD Transfer Pricing (TP) Guidelines.

taci.jpg
sagianni.jpg

Afrodita Taci

Anastasia Sagianni

TP rules in Croatia are prescribed by Article 13 of the Corporate Income Tax (CIT) Act (the Act) and by Article 40 of the CIT Bylaw (the Regulation). Under these rules, the prices or conditions of transactions between related parties must be based on the arm's length principle.

Apart from cross-border transactions, transactions between resident associated entities also fall under the TP rules if one of the parties:

  • Has a privileged tax status;

  • Is subject to profit tax at a rate lower than the stipulated rates;

  • Is exempt from the payment of profits tax; or

  • Is entitled to carry forward the tax loss from previous tax periods in the given tax period.

Related parties

The definition of associated parties is very broad and includes persons that directly or indirectly participate in the management, control, or capital of the other party. Unlike some other jurisdictions, the Croatian CIT Law does not include any threshold percentage for the definition of associated entities.

TP methods and data

The Act and the Regulation prescribe the use of different methods for determining whether the prices are agreed at arm's-length. Generally, the same methods as those prescribed by the OECD are applicable, including:

  • The comparable uncontrolled price (CUP) method;

  • The resale price method (RPM);

  • The cost plus method (CPM);

  • The transactional net margin method (TNMM); or

  • The profit split method (PSM).

It is worth noting that internal data and traditional methods are preferred by Croatian tax authorities.

TP audits and penalties

There is no specific deadline for preparing TP documentation, but the law requires that the documents are available and submitted to the tax authorities upon request in a tax audit. Taxpayers should have the documents available at the same time as submitting the annual tax return, which happens at the end of the fourth month from the taxpayer's year end (April 30 for the majority of companies).

Failure to have the correct documents ready

There are no special TP audit procedures in Croatia, but the tax authority has published the "Guidebook for Surveillance of Transfer Pricing" that was designed for internal use, but is now also available to all taxpayers.

The number of audits relating to TP have increased in the past few years with tax authorities exhibiting an aggressive approach to large management fee payments or other intra-group payments that suggest a high TP risk.

There are also no specific TP penalties, but standard fines can be as high as HRK 200,000 (€29,000) for a company and up to HRK 20,000 for the responsible individual within the company. Penalty interest would also be calculated from the date when the tax was due until the date when it is paid. For the most severe tax violations, the penalty can reach HRK 500,000 for the legal entity.

Statute of limitation period

The general statute of limitation expires at the end of the third year following the year in which a tax return should have been filed. However, the general statute of limitation may be extended and recommence after each intervention by the tax authority with respect to a filed tax return. The absolute statute of limitation is six years. However, attention should be paid on relevant amendments regarding the extension of the limitation period.

Afrodita Taci (afrodita.taci@eurofast.eu) and Anastasia Sagianni (anastasia.sagianni@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Croatia

Tel: +385 98 525 758

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Moore, founding partner of the Chicago tax boutique which bears her name, shares her career wisdom for ITR’s new Women in Tax interview series
But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
Gift this article