Brazil: Withholding tax obligation on the substitution of shares; New rules on documentation for Brazilian non-resident capital gains taxation

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Withholding tax obligation on the substitution of shares; New rules on documentation for Brazilian non-resident capital gains taxation

giacobbo.jpg
gottberg.jpg

Fernando Giacobbo

Ruben Gottberg

Withholding tax obligation on the substitution of shares

Brazilian Federal Revenue (RFB, by its Portuguese acronym) issued Normative Instruction (NI) 1.664, establishing the responsible party for withholding income taxes on non-resident capital gains arising from the substitution of shares (incorporação de ações).

Under Brazilian legislation, a substitution of shares is a transaction where the whole share capital of a Brazilian entity is transferred into the equity of another Brazilian entity. As a result of this, the latter becomes the shareholder of the former (new shareholder).

According to NI 1.664, when it comes to the substitution of shares, the new shareholder is responsible for withholding income taxes on capital gains realised by non-residents upon the alienation of the transferring entity's shares.

Throughout the years, there has been a debate about whether the alienation of a transferring entity's shares is actually made by the shareholders. In some cases, administrative decisions have confirmed that the alienation has been made by the shareholders, whereas, in other instances, the decisions concluded that the alienation has been made by the transferring entity itself. NI 1.664, confirms ruling 224, issued by the tax authorities (Solução de Consulta COSIT 224), where the alienation is regarded as made by the shareholders.

Although NI 1.664 does not hold a legal status, it is important to note that tax inspectors are bound by this instrument when performing audits.

Multinationals are encouraged to analyse how these changes may affect their intended reorganisations.

New rules on documentation for Brazilian non-resident capital gains taxation

The RFB recently issued NI 1.662, modifying the options available to support the cost basis for calculating non-resident capital gains taxation.

Before NI 1.622 was issued, NI 1.455 provided two options to determine the cost basis for calculating non-resident capital gains taxation in situations where there was no suitable and proper documentation:

1) Based on the amount of foreign capital registered with the Brazilian Central Bank (BACEN); or

2) The cost basis equal to zero.

As of October 3 2016, NI 1.662 eliminates the option to determine the cost basis based on the amount of foreign capital registered with the BACEN where there is no suitable and proper documentation. This change has given rise to concerns as to whether the BACEN's electronic module of foreign direct investment, together with additional documentation, may be regarded as suitable and proper documentation when it comes to support the cost basis for calculating non-resident capital gains taxation.

Multinationals are encouraged to analyse how to address this change.

Fernando Giacobbo (fernando.giacobbo@br.pwc.com) and Ruben Gottberg (ruben.gottberg@br.pwc.com)

PwC

Website: www.pwc.com.br

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

As the firm embarks on a major shakeup of its EMEA partnerships, some staff will be watching nervously
The buyout of Hucke and Associates continues Ryan’s streak of firm acquisitions; in other news, a UK appeal against VAT on private school fees was dismissed
Tax teams are responding to usual client demand in the region, albeit with increased working from home flexibility, local sources indicate
A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Gift this article