New Zealand: New Zealand Inland Revenue releases MNE compliance focus document

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Zealand: New Zealand Inland Revenue releases MNE compliance focus document

journeaux.jpg

Hamish Journeaux

The New Zealand Inland Revenue has released a document setting out its compliance focus in respect of multinational enterprises (MNEs).

The document sets out the general approach the Inland Revenue will take in monitoring the tax positions of MNEs. It also details a number of specific tax regimes or arrangements (including international financing agreements and transfer pricing, discussed further below) that the Inland Revenue has identified as key focus areas for ongoing compliance monitoring. Therefore, the document is a useful resource for MNEs to consult in regard to their New Zealand tax risk management.

As mentioned in previous updates, there is significant media and public interest in New Zealand regarding the tax treatment of MNEs and whether they are paying their "fair share" of tax in New Zealand. The Inland Revenue makes reference to this, noting in the introduction to the document that while Inland Revenue is "confident that most [MNEs] are paying the tax they should in New Zealand, the public appears less convinced."

Two aspects of the document provide useful practical guidance regarding areas of risk that the Inland Revenue has identified. One concerns cross-border financing arrangements and the other concerns the Inland Revenue's transfer pricing focus.

The document notes that cross-border financing arrangements comprise a substantial part of the related-party dealings by New Zealand members of multinational groups, and that the documentation in respect of these financing arrangements is often "minimal or non-existent".

The document also lists a number of details that are "fundamentals", which should be clearly documented in related-party transactions. These include:

  • Purpose or intention of the financing;

  • Full names of all lenders, borrowers and other parties;

  • Total amount available under the loan facility and currency;

  • Interest rate (either absolute rate, or external benchmark rate plus a margin);

  • Interest payment dates;

  • Term of loan facility and repayment obligations;

  • Details of fees payable;

  • Nature of security given;

  • Nature and details of guarantee given; and

  • Amendments to the financing agreements over time.

The document further lists a number of risks, which, if present, will result in additional scrutiny from the Inland Revenue. Examples include where interest rates or guarantee fees are priced at non-market rates, or where the MNE uses hybrid instruments and hybrid entities in structured arrangements.

In respect of transfer pricing, the document highlights some areas that the tax agency is actively focused on reviewing:

  • Wholesalers or distributors that purchase and sell goods without significant transformation; and

  • MNEs who restructure their operations involving the shifting of any major functions, assets or risks away from New Zealand.

Inland Revenue endorses the OECD's recommendations in respect of transfer pricing documentation. This approach is for an MNE to maintain two forms of documentation:

  • A master file providing a high level overview of the MNE's global business operations and transfer pricing policies; and

  • A local file providing detailed information regarding material related-party transactions.

The document signals that tax compliance on the part of MNEs remains a priority for the Inland Revenue. We can expect to see that cross-border financing arrangements and transfer pricing compliance generally will remain an area of particular focus for the Inland Revenue.

Hamish Journeaux (hamish.journeaux@russellmcveagh.com), Auckland

Russell McVeagh

Tel: +64 9 367 8037

Website: www.russellmcveagh.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Tax teams are responding to usual client demand in the region, albeit with increased working from home flexibility, local sources indicate
A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Tom Goldstein, who was represented by US law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson, denied wilfully cheating on his taxes and blamed errors on his staff
Multinationals face rising TP scrutiny as global rules diverge. As Daniel Moalusi argues, strong, consistent documentation is now essential to minimise audit risk and protect tax positions
Gift this article