Ireland: Tax treatment of exchange traded funds

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Ireland: Tax treatment of exchange traded funds

thornton.jpg

tully.jpg

Gerry Thornton


Philip Tully

The Irish Revenue Commissioners recently published a guidance note to clarify their position on the tax treatment of Irish investors investing in exchange traded funds (ETFs) domiciled outside Ireland. In Table 1, we have summarised the relevant tax treatment that Revenue will apply. To give the full picture, we have also included the treatment of Irish domiciled ETFs. The Revenue guidance is solely focused on the tax treatment of investors that are Irish tax resident. The guidance is not relevant to non-Irish investors who hold units in Irish ETFs. The Irish tax treatment in respect of such non-Irish investors is clear; such investors are wholly exempt from Irish tax on their returns from Irish ETFs.

Table 1

Domicile of ETF

Tax treatment

1. Ireland

No exit tax. Irish resident individuals are subject to income tax at a special rate of 41% on all returns (dividends and gains) on a self-assessment basis. No social insurance (PRSI) or universal social charge (USC). Any losses are ring-fenced and are not available for offset.

2. EU – UCITS

Taxed in the same way as Irish ETFs (see above). Therefore, Irish resident individuals are subject to income tax at a special rate of 41% on all returns (dividends and gains) on a self-assessment basis. No PRSI or USC. Any losses are ring-fenced and are not available for offset. This position has always been clear and follows specific legislative provisions.

3. EU – Non-UCITS

In most cases, taxed in the same way as Irish ETFs (that is, 41% tax, no charge to PRSI or USC and losses ring-fenced). However, Revenue acknowledge that it is possible that some EU ETFs which are not UCITS may, because of their legal set-up, fall outside the 41% income tax regime and may instead be subject to normal capital gains tax (33%) and income tax rules (as described below). Revenue are willing to consider submissions on a case-by-case basis in this regard and acknowledge that taxpayers may decide to take such a position in appropriate cases.

4. Non-EU OECD (eg, US)

Generally, subject to normal capital gains tax and income tax rules. Therefore, marginal rate income tax (up to 40%), plus USC (up to 11%) and PRSI (4%), as applicable, on dividends received by Irish resident individuals and 33% capital gains on capital gains arising on the disposal of shares. Capital losses may generally be used to offset gains. Therefore, dividends will generally be taxed at a higher rate than European ETFs (1-3 above) but gains will generally be taxed at a lower rate.

5. Non-OECD (eg, Singapore)

Subject to a different tax treatment again. Both income and gains will generally be taxed at marginal income tax rate (up to 40%), plus USC (up to 11%) and PRSI (4%), as applicable.


Gerry Thornton
(gerry.thornton@matheson.com) and Philip Tully (philip.tully@matheson.com)

Matheson

Tel: + 353 1 232 2000

Website: www.matheson.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The event comes at an important moment for professionals dealing with practical realities related to this practice area
Germany’s dogmatic restriction of third-party investment in tax advisory firms will only serve to slow down innovation and access to justice
The Irish government has been told that it’s spending too much of its corporation tax receipts and should instead focus on running bigger surpluses; plus, the IRS is set to merge tax practitioner offices
A company risks double taxation, penalties and inquiry cost if it submits a form with anomalies under the new system, Asker Ali also tells ITR
Arindam Mitra and Robin Hart examine how aggregate TP rules clash with transaction-level customs rules, creating compliance risks and requiring granular, SKU-level pricing strategies
The scandal has come just three years after the PwC tax leaks controversy and has prompted KPMG’s Australian chief executive to resign
In the first of a two-part series on capital v revenue in R&D, Jayne Stokes explores these key concepts and where UK companies need to tread carefully
Magnus Pantzar is set to join as managing director after spending nearly a decade as EQT’s global head of tax
The OECD’s project was up for debate as Matt Williams spoke to ITR following BDO’s tax strategist survey, which uncovered increased complexity and costs among multinationals
The recent spree of firm mergers and acquisitions proves that geographic scale is the name of the game
Gift this article