Italy: Companies migrating to Italy: New ‘internationalisation’ decree introduces rules to determine assets and liabilities’ tax basis

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Italy: Companies migrating to Italy: New ‘internationalisation’ decree introduces rules to determine assets and liabilities’ tax basis

Foglia-Giuliano
Emma-Marco

Giuliano Foglia

Marco Emma

The 'internationalisation' decree (formally, legislative decree No 147 of September 14 2015) has been recently published on the Official Gazette and is now effective.

The decree introduced different measures aimed at removing uncertainties and providing a more definite and stable tax legal framework, with a view to attracting foreign investors. Above all, the decree introduced, for the first time, a clear provision in relation to the corporate income tax effects for foreign companies migrating to Italy. Italian tax law did not previously cover such case.

According to article 12 of the decree, the transfer of tax residence from a white-list country to Italy involves the step-up of the tax basis of foreign company's assets and liabilities at fair market value, regardless of the application of an 'exit tax' in the state from which assets are transferred. In case of 'inbound' migration from a non-white listed country, the above mentioned step up is subject to the conclusion of an international ruling (APA) with the Italian tax authorities. If no ruling is obtained, the 'non-white list' company shall assume the lower between the acquisition cost, the book value or the market value as tax basis of the assets 'relocated' to Italy, while the tax basis of the liabilities will be the higher among such values.

Such provision, effective from fiscal year 2015, represents an impressive step forward, compared with the previous situation of uncertainty. Due to the lack of any provision in this respect, in fact, it was widely debated before the internationalisation decree whether transferred assets had to be valuated according (i) to the market value or alternatively (ii) to the acquisition cost method. Even if the market value principle seems to prevail (as implicitly confirmed now by the new decree), the Italian Revenue Agency occasionally took the position that the tax step up of assets relocated to Italy was allowed only provided that the state from which the assets were transferred applied an 'exit tax'. Difficulties arose where an exit tax in principle applied but a specific exemption regime was granted by the exit state on certain assets (for example, the participation exemption regime).

In this context, not only does the new provision fill a legislative gap in the Italian tax framework, but it also represents an alluring occasion for foreign investors to step up the tax basis of their assets.

Interesting tax opportunities, in particular, may arise in relation to intellectual properties held by non-Italian resident companies from the combination of the new 'inbound' migration step up possibility with the partial corporate income tax exemption available under the new Italian Patent Box regime. In a nutshell, the Patent Box allows a 50% corporate income tax exemption in relation to income deriving from direct or indirect use of certain IP rights (currently including commercial trademarks). Such optional regime applies, under certain circumstances, on the basis of the ratio of a) R&D expenses borne to maintain, increase and develop the intangible asset, and to b) total expenses sustained for the creation of such IP right.

Giuliano Foglia (foglia@virtax.it) and Marco Emma (emma@virtax.it)

Tremonti Vitali Romagnoli Piccardi e Associati

Tel: +39 06 3218022 (Rome); +39 02 58313707 (Milan)

Website: www.virtax.it

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Mid-market European private equity house Inflexion, which also backs law firm DWF, has agreed to acquire a minority stake in the Dutch tax advisory firm
Donald Trump’s inauguration, pillar two, APAs and TP were all up for discussion as ITR spoke to Baker McKenzie’s two newly minted US partners
In-house teams that want a balance of internal control and external expertise for pillar two should seriously consider co-sourcing models, Russell Gammon of Tax Systems argues
The OECD has vowed to continue working with the US despite the president effectively pulling the country out of the organisation’s global minimum tax deal
Norton Rose Fulbright highlights a Brazilian investment fund as a practical example of how new Dutch tax rules will require significant attention from foreign companies
Thomson Reuters now has ‘end-to-end capability’ for its tax workflow business, according to its president for tax accounting and audit professionals
Patrick O’Gara, who is rated as a ‘highly regarded practitioner’ by World Tax, had spent over 20 years at Baker McKenzie
If approved, it would become the first ‘big four’ firm to practise law in the US; in other news, Morrison Foerster hired a new global tax co-chair
The ‘birth date’ of the service, which will collect tariffs, duties and other foreign revenue, will be January 20
Awards
Submit your nominations to this year's WIBL Americas Awards by February 28
Gift this article