Chile: Tax credit regarding Chilean sourced income subject to withholding tax in a foreign jurisdiction

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile: Tax credit regarding Chilean sourced income subject to withholding tax in a foreign jurisdiction

pelegri.jpg

burrull.jpg

Loreto Pelegrí


Ignacio Burrull

On September 29 2014, Law No. 20.780 was published in the Chilean Official Gazette ("the Tax Reform"), which introduced several modifications to the Chilean taxation system. Among other modifications, and as a useful complement of a previous reform made which entered into force on January 1 2014, which increased the amount of credit that could be used for taxes paid abroad, either from treaty or non-treaty countries, and also established that the credit balances could be carried forward until its full extinction (while the previous regulation did not allow its use in case of tax losses), the Tax Reform introduced a subtle yet relevant modification to articles 41 A and 41 C of the Chilean Income Tax Law (Chilean ITL), which contains various provisions that aim to avoid international double taxation.

In fact, before the Tax Reform, said articles established that Chilean resident or Chilean domiciled taxpayers who obtained incomes from abroad were allowed to use a foreign tax credit. A contrario sensu, the Chilean IRS, interpreted in several rulings that a Chilean entity receiving Chilean-sourced income subject to withholding taxes in a foreign jurisdiction (for example, remuneration for services rendered in Chile to a non-domiciled entity) was not allowed to use a foreign tax credit.

The Tax Reform modified the heading of said articles, eliminating the phrase 'from abroad' from its content. The purpose of this elimination is to widen the scope of application of the provisions that seek to avoid the double taxation of incomes, since, before this elimination; the aforementioned provisions were only applicable to foreign-sourced income that had been taxed abroad as well.

In such a situation, if a Chilean resident or Chilean domiciled taxpayer had to render a service to a non-resident or non-domiciled taxpayer, it was more convenient to travel abroad and render it outside Chile, so that the income received was considered as foreign income, hence not subject, as a general rule, to Chilean taxes.

Accordingly, as per the new heading of articles 41 A and 41 C, the provisions that aim to avoid the international double taxation are now, also, applicable to incomes that fulfill the following cumulative conditions:

  • Obtained in Chile or abroad; and

  • Have been taxed abroad.

Therefore, with this new provision, the Chilean resident or Chilean domiciled taxpayer, in the example above, will be able to use, with certain limits, as a credit against the corporate income tax (CIT) levied in Chile, the taxes paid abroad for the income received for the rendering of its services, even if they are performed within Chilean territory (Chilean-sourced income).

As per the modification explained above, the Tax Reform, which was vastly criticised by many sectors of the Chilean economy, envisaged a change that is actually beneficial for taxpayers, allowing, and promoting, an easier and more transparent way to continue or expand its operations abroad.

Loreto Pelegrí (loreto.pelegri@cl.pwc.com) and Ignacio Burrull (ignacio.burrull@cl.pwc.com)

PwC

Website: www.pwc.cl

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

It is understood that the US has vowed to oppose any outcome from talks taking place at the UN
It’s the second year in a row that RSM’s tax business has posted fee income growth above 10%
Recent guidance from the Indian tax authorities should provide confidence for investors, says Sanjay Sanghvi of Khaitan & Co
Grant Wardell-Johnson also suggests there could be solutions to the friction between the US and the OECD when it comes to pillar two
The president had so far avoided announcing tariffs on the US’s neighbours despite previous threats
The firm brought in three managing directors from EY and Deloitte in Europe; in other news, KPMG’s bid to practise law in US was delayed
One expert argues the ERS would be unlikely to improve taxpayers’ experience unless it comes with additional funding to hire more agents and staff
From pillar two and amount B to Apple’s headline EU Commission dispute, Martin Bonner and Yiwen Ping of Kreston Global argue that 2024’s key TP developments will inform 2025
Holland & Knight, Nelson Mullins and McCarter & English made the joint-most tax partner hires in the US last year, according to annual ITR Talent Tracker data
Despite a three-year-high in tax revenues generated from settling TP cases, HMRC reported a sharp fall in resolved MAP disputes
Gift this article