Germany: Deduction of foreign partner’s interest expense

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Deduction of foreign partner’s interest expense

schanzle.jpg

birker.jpg

Dr Thomas Schänzle


Christian Birker

On September 26 2014, the Finance Ministry revised its comprehensive circular on the treatment of partnerships under the tax treaties. Of particular interest are its remarks on partners' interest costs incurred in connection with their partnership holdings. The fundamental principle behind the German computation of partnership income is that all income flowing to a partner is deemed to be part of that partner's profit share and thus does not reduce the partnership's profit as a business expense (loan interest, service fees and so on) and that all expenses incurred by a partner in respect of his investment or activities in the partnership are deductible from his share of the partnership income. This principle is reaffirmed by a treaty override provision in the Income Tax Act which applies unless the treaty explicitly states otherwise.

The revised circular now seems to be casting doubt on the continued application of the general principle, in particular in respect of loan interest incurred by a foreign partner. It states that such interest may only be deducted from the German source partnership income if it is effectively connected with that income. It then mentions the financing cost of an interest-free loan to the partnership as an example of a lack of the necessary connection. However, it is silent as to whether the same applies in cases where the partner's equity is refinanced.

Deduction of a partner's financing costs for the acquisition of a partnership share is a fundamental building block of many inbound partnership structures. Although it is and continues to be based on German partnership taxation principles, recourse to the courts may now be necessary.

Dr Thomas Schänzle (thomas.schaenzle@de.pwc.com) and Christian Birker (christian.birker@de.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +49 69 9585 6477 and +49 69 9585 6061

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

It is understood that the US has vowed to oppose any outcome from talks taking place at the UN
It’s the second year in a row that RSM’s tax business has posted fee income growth above 10%
Recent guidance from the Indian tax authorities should provide confidence for investors, says Sanjay Sanghvi of Khaitan & Co
Grant Wardell-Johnson also suggests there could be solutions to the friction between the US and the OECD when it comes to pillar two
The president had so far avoided announcing tariffs on the US’s neighbours despite previous threats
The firm brought in three managing directors from EY and Deloitte in Europe; in other news, KPMG’s bid to practise law in US was delayed
One expert argues the ERS would be unlikely to improve taxpayers’ experience unless it comes with additional funding to hire more agents and staff
From pillar two and amount B to Apple’s headline EU Commission dispute, Martin Bonner and Yiwen Ping of Kreston Global argue that 2024’s key TP developments will inform 2025
Holland & Knight, Nelson Mullins and McCarter & English made the joint-most tax partner hires in the US last year, according to annual ITR Talent Tracker data
Despite a three-year-high in tax revenues generated from settling TP cases, HMRC reported a sharp fall in resolved MAP disputes
Gift this article