Croatia: Croatia signs double taxation avoidance agreement with the UK

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Croatia: Croatia signs double taxation avoidance agreement with the UK

jakovljevic.jpg

David Jakovljevic

Croatia and the UK have signed an agreement for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income and on capital gains. The agreement was duly signed on January 15 2015 and will enter into force when both countries complete their parliamentary procedures and exchange a diplomatic note, which is expected by the end of 2015. The agreement applies to persons who are residents of one or both contracting states and covers (i) the taxes on income and on (ii) capital gains imposed on behalf of a contracting state, irrespective of the manner in which they are levied. The agreement is expected to facilitate an increase in direct investments between Croatia and UK.

Legal entities conducting international transport of goods between UK and Croatia pay income tax only in their resident state. The same also applies to the corporate income tax in general, including income from international shipping and air transportation, provided that the company does not have a permanent establishment (PE) in the other state. In that case, the company's PE will be liable for tax in the state where the services were provided.

According to the agreement a 5% withholding tax rate will also be applicable in the source state, on interest and royalty payments. With regards to dividends, a 5% withholding tax rate will apply, provided that the beneficiary has a controlling interest (directly or indirectly) of at least 25% in the share capital of the dividend paying company. A 15% rate will apply if the dividends are paid out of income (including gains) which is derived directly or indirectly from immovable property by an investment vehicle which distributes most of this income annually and whose income from such immovable property is exempted from tax. In a different context, a 10% withholding tax will apply.

Conclusively, board members, artists, sport professionals and workers can pay their income tax within the contractual state where the income is created, whereas the pension income is taxed in the state where the beneficiary is resident.

Equal treatment towards companies of both countries is also stipulated in the agreement as the principle, as is the procedure of mutual cooperation with the use of diplomatic channels, which would contribute to more effective problem solving.

The agreement will have a significant impact on transactions between the UK and Croatia, even though the UK restricted free movement of workers from and to Croatia for seven years as of July 1 2013.

David Jakovljevic (david.jakovljevic@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Global Croatia

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In the first of a two-part series on capital v revenue in R&D, Jayne Stokes explores these key concepts and where UK companies need to tread carefully
Magnus Pantzar is set to join as managing director after spending nearly a decade as EQT’s global head of tax
The OECD’s project was up for debate as Matt Williams spoke to ITR following BDO’s tax strategist survey, which uncovered increased complexity and costs among multinationals
Sponsored by Deloitte
Sameer Nurmohamed, partner, Deloitte Legal Canada
Sponsored by Deloitte
George Ankomah, partner, Tax & Regulatory Services, Deloitte Africa (Ghana)
The recent spree of firm mergers and acquisitions proves that geographic scale is the name of the game
The big four spin-off firm becomes Taxand’s second UK member; in other news, Haynes Boone launched a UK tax practice
Sponsored by Deloitte Luxembourg
Jean-Michel Henry and Mona El-Begawi of Deloitte Luxembourg examine the complexities created by timing differences in Luxembourg, EU, and OECD tax regimes
Stephanie Pantelidaki’s economic expertise will give Norton Rose Fulbright’s other teams ‘extra firepower,’ she says
Sponsored by MFA Legal & Tech
Samuel Fernandes de Almeida of MFA Legal & Tech assesses whether Portugal’s 7.5% surcharge on non-residents aligns with the EU’s free movement of capital principle and passes the proportionality test
Gift this article