Croatia: Croatia signs double taxation avoidance agreement with the UK

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Croatia: Croatia signs double taxation avoidance agreement with the UK

jakovljevic.jpg

David Jakovljevic

Croatia and the UK have signed an agreement for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income and on capital gains. The agreement was duly signed on January 15 2015 and will enter into force when both countries complete their parliamentary procedures and exchange a diplomatic note, which is expected by the end of 2015. The agreement applies to persons who are residents of one or both contracting states and covers (i) the taxes on income and on (ii) capital gains imposed on behalf of a contracting state, irrespective of the manner in which they are levied. The agreement is expected to facilitate an increase in direct investments between Croatia and UK.

Legal entities conducting international transport of goods between UK and Croatia pay income tax only in their resident state. The same also applies to the corporate income tax in general, including income from international shipping and air transportation, provided that the company does not have a permanent establishment (PE) in the other state. In that case, the company's PE will be liable for tax in the state where the services were provided.

According to the agreement a 5% withholding tax rate will also be applicable in the source state, on interest and royalty payments. With regards to dividends, a 5% withholding tax rate will apply, provided that the beneficiary has a controlling interest (directly or indirectly) of at least 25% in the share capital of the dividend paying company. A 15% rate will apply if the dividends are paid out of income (including gains) which is derived directly or indirectly from immovable property by an investment vehicle which distributes most of this income annually and whose income from such immovable property is exempted from tax. In a different context, a 10% withholding tax will apply.

Conclusively, board members, artists, sport professionals and workers can pay their income tax within the contractual state where the income is created, whereas the pension income is taxed in the state where the beneficiary is resident.

Equal treatment towards companies of both countries is also stipulated in the agreement as the principle, as is the procedure of mutual cooperation with the use of diplomatic channels, which would contribute to more effective problem solving.

The agreement will have a significant impact on transactions between the UK and Croatia, even though the UK restricted free movement of workers from and to Croatia for seven years as of July 1 2013.

David Jakovljevic (david.jakovljevic@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Global Croatia

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The boutique Australian firm’s TP award recognition proves that world-class advisory services aren’t limited to the ‘big four’, the firm’s founder tells ITR
Canadian and Indian dual VAT models have been a source of inspiration for the Brazilian model, but the latter has unique and innovative features, the OECD paper claimed
More sophisticated use of technology, heightened TP scrutiny and stricter filing requirements are making South African Revenue Service audits a formidable challenge
The hire of Doug Wick expands Baker McKenzie’s state and local tax practice and adds to the firm’s growing ex-IRS expertise
One year after Nuwaru joined the WTS network, leaders James Jobson and Matthew Missaghi reflect on the firm’s mission to offer mid-tier pricing but deliver top-tier results
Join ITR's Head of Research, John Harrison, for an overview of key dates, new developments, best practices, and more for next year’s research cycle
The president’s tariff regime has already caused misery for taxpayers. Losing at the Supreme Court would mean it was all for nothing
The US itself was the biggest loser of tax revenue to American multinationals’ profit shifting, the Tax Justice Network reported; in other news, firms made key tax hires
Identifying who will bear the costs and concerns around confidentiality are issues yet to be resolved, advisers say
As multinationals embed tax technology into their TP functions, a new breed of systems – built on multi-model databases – is quietly transforming intercompany pricing logic
Gift this article