Australia: Australia updating financial services tax concessions

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia: Australia updating financial services tax concessions

ahn.jpg

Eddie Ahn

March saw the release of draft legislation for the long awaited reforms to the Investment Manager Regime (IMR) and Offshore Banking Unit (OBU) concessions, as well as further progress on transfer pricing and exchange of tax information. On March 12, the Australian Government released the draft legislation for the third stage of the IMR reforms. These reforms remove tax impediments to investing in Australia in order to attract foreign investment and promote the use of Australian fund managers. The amendments in the draft legislation broaden the income tax and capital gains tax (CGT) exemptions under the IMR concessions to cover investments in Australian assets (excluding real property) that are of a portfolio nature. The changes also broaden the 'widely held' test to be more consistent with and expand on the corresponding test in the Australian managed investment trust provisions. Qualifying foreign entities will be eligible for the IMR concession if they directly invest in Australia or invest via an independent Australian fund manager.

The Australian Government also released draft legislation for the reforms to Offshore Banking Unit (OBU) regime on March 12. These reforms address a number of integrity concerns with the existing regime while ensuring the OBU regime targets mobile financial sector activity. Under the current OBU rules, assessable income from eligible offshore banking (OB) activities is effectively subject to a tax rate of 10%, rather than the current corporate tax rate of 30%. One of the key changes under the new rules is to modernise the list of eligible OB activities to include certain lending, trading, investment management, advisory and leasing activities.

On March 3, the Australian Government announced that Australia and Switzerland had agreed to the automatic exchange of certain tax information based on the OECD's common reporting standard (CRS). Under the agreement, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) will automatically receive details of certain financial accounts such as investment income and balances held by Australians in Switzerland. Similarly, the Swiss Federal Tax Administration will receive details of Swiss residents that hold financial accounts in Australia. The CRS is to be implemented from 2017, with information exchanges to start in 2018.

In recent months the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has issued several 'taxation rulings' and 'practice statements' to provide guidance on the new Australian transfer pricing rules that recently came into effect. Most recently, the ATO issued Practice Statement PS LA 2015/3 on February 26, which outlines the internal ATO approval processes in identifying the arm's-length conditions relating to cross-border transfer pricing and whether or not the analysis should be based on the actual commercial or financial relations of the relevant parties to a transaction.

In a goods and services tax (GST) context, the Federal Court recently handed down a decision in a test case concerning costs incurred to provide housing to workers and contractors in remote mining towns. The taxpayer, Rio Tinto, argued the costs were incidental to its mining activities and hence should give rise to an input tax credit (GST credit). The Court rejected this argument and held that the costs had a "direct and immediate" connection with residential leasing supplies which are input taxed.

Finally, the draft legislation for the managed investment trust (MIT) concession reforms is expected to be released for public consultation by the end of this month.

Eddie Ahn (eddie.ahn@dlapiper.com)

DLA Piper

Tel: +61 2 9286 8268

Website: www.dlapiper.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While the US’s dramatic exit from the OECD’s global tax deal naturally grabbed headlines, Trump’s premeditated move shouldn’t detract from pillar two’s lofty ambitions
The ‘big four’ firm’s audit of gambling company Entain is under the spotlight; in other news, Ireland shrugs off Trump’s rejection of pillar two
Mid-market European private equity house Inflexion, which also backs law firm DWF, has agreed to acquire a minority stake in the Dutch tax advisory firm
Donald Trump’s inauguration, pillar two, APAs and TP were all up for discussion as ITR spoke to Baker McKenzie’s two newly minted US partners
In-house teams that want a balance of internal control and external expertise for pillar two should seriously consider co-sourcing models, Russell Gammon of Tax Systems argues
The OECD has vowed to continue working with the US despite the president effectively pulling the country out of the organisation’s global minimum tax deal
Norton Rose Fulbright highlights a Brazilian investment fund as a practical example of how new Dutch tax rules will require significant attention from foreign companies
Thomson Reuters now has ‘end-to-end capability’ for its tax workflow business, according to its president for tax accounting and audit professionals
Patrick O’Gara, who is rated as a ‘highly regarded practitioner’ by World Tax, had spent over 20 years at Baker McKenzie
If approved, it would become the first ‘big four’ firm to practise law in the US; in other news, Morrison Foerster hired a new global tax co-chair
Gift this article