Brazil: Tax rulings issued dealing with the registration of payments in SISCOSERV

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Tax rulings issued dealing with the registration of payments in SISCOSERV

jeffrey.jpg

conomy.jpg

Philippe Jeffrey


Mark Conomy

On February 25 2015 and February 26 2015, the Brazilian Federal Revenue Authorities (RFB) issued a number of rulings in response to formal consultations by taxpayers in relation to the registration of certain payments in the Integrated System of Foreign Service Trade (SISCOSERV). By way of background, since August 2012, Brazilian individuals, legal entities and other entities without legal personality have been required to provide information to the Ministry for Development, Industry, and International Trade in relation to transactions carried out with non-residents involving services, intangibles and other operations that produce changes to the Brazilian entity's net worth.

In response to continuing uncertainty over whether certain transactions should be registered in the SISCOSERV, the RFB have issued a number of rulings responding to formal consultations made by taxpayers.

On February 25 2015, the RFB issued Tax Ruling No. 20/2015 in relation to whether salary and allowance payments made by Brazilian entities to their employees sent to work abroad should be registered in the SISCOSERV. Broadly, registration in the SISCOSERV will be required where the transaction is realised between a resident or entity/individual domiciled in Brazil and a resident or entity/individual domiciled abroad. Brazilian workers abroad are generally considered residents in Brazil during the first 12 consecutive months of absence from the country. After that (that is, from the 13th consecutive month of absence from Brazil), the worker should be considered a non-resident for Brazilian tax purposes and therefore any payments made to this worker should be registered with SISCOSERV. The above treatment will also apply where the payments to the worker are made through intermediary agencies abroad.

On February 25 2015, the RFB issued Tax Ruling No. 21/2015, providing guidance on registration requirements for payments made by Brazilian entities in relation to cost sharing arrangements, where the activity is classified under the Nomenclature of Services (NBS). The NBS sets out a list of codes in order to classify the activities for SISCOSERV purposes (some codes being quite specific while others are quite broad). Pursuant to the ruling, the RFB considers that where a foreign group entity acquires services from a third party, which are subsequently recharged to the Brazilian entity, information in relation to the payments made by the Brazilian entity to the foreign group entity should be registered in the SISCOSERV. Further, where the foreign group entity uses its own administrative structure to provide benefits to the group (including the Brazilian entity), information relating to the payments made by the Brazilian entity to the foreign group entity in relation to the provision of these services should be registered, on the basis that such transactions produce changes to the Brazilian entity's net worth.

On February 26 2015, the RFB issued Tax Ruling No. 32/2015 in relation to whether payments made by Brazilian entities with a 'commercial presence' abroad are obliged to register in the SISCOSERV, information related to the acquisition of services, intangibles and other transactions producing a change in net worth. Under the General Agreement on Trade in Services (a treaty to which Brazil is a signatory) the expression 'commercial presence' includes representative offices of the Brazilian companies, located abroad. Therefore, where representative offices of Brazilian entities located abroad make acquisitions of services, intangibles or enter into other operations resulting in a change to the net equity, the relevant information should be registered in the SISCOSERV.

Philippe Jeffrey (philippe.jeffrey@br.pwc.com) and Mark Conomy (conomy.mark@br.pwc.com)

PwC

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While the US’s dramatic exit from the OECD’s global tax deal naturally grabbed headlines, Trump’s premeditated move shouldn’t detract from pillar two’s lofty ambitions
The ‘big four’ firm’s audit of gambling company Entain is under the spotlight; in other news, Ireland shrugs off Trump’s rejection of pillar two
Mid-market European private equity house Inflexion, which also backs law firm DWF, has agreed to acquire a minority stake in the Dutch tax advisory firm
Donald Trump’s inauguration, pillar two, APAs and TP were all up for discussion as ITR spoke to Baker McKenzie’s two newly minted US partners
In-house teams that want a balance of internal control and external expertise for pillar two should seriously consider co-sourcing models, Russell Gammon of Tax Systems argues
The OECD has vowed to continue working with the US despite the president effectively pulling the country out of the organisation’s global minimum tax deal
Norton Rose Fulbright highlights a Brazilian investment fund as a practical example of how new Dutch tax rules will require significant attention from foreign companies
Thomson Reuters now has ‘end-to-end capability’ for its tax workflow business, according to its president for tax accounting and audit professionals
Patrick O’Gara, who is rated as a ‘highly regarded practitioner’ by World Tax, had spent over 20 years at Baker McKenzie
If approved, it would become the first ‘big four’ firm to practise law in the US; in other news, Morrison Foerster hired a new global tax co-chair
Gift this article