EU: June ECOFIN Council debates mandatory AEoI, tax rulings and Interest & Royalties Directive

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


EU: June ECOFIN Council debates mandatory AEoI, tax rulings and Interest & Royalties Directive

van-der-made.jpg

Bob van der Made

Proposal for mandatory automatic exchange of information (AEoI) with regard to tax rulings (DAC3)

Selected issues discussed:

  • The scope and timing of information to be exchanged, and further alignment with work carried out by the OECD;

  • The exemption of bilateral and multilateral advance pricing agreements (APAs) with third countries; and

  • The European Commission's role in the new mechanism with regard to DAC3, since the Commission is not a competent tax authority.

A number of finance ministers intervened in the ECOFIN public session: France, Germany, Ireland, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and the UK. Most member states came out publicly in favour of the proposal, even though Council working group negotiations on the proposal apparently made very little progress in July.

Luxemburg said during the ECOFIN debate that it is an absolute priority for the Luxembourg EU Council presidency to adopt this proposal before the end of its presidency term (December 31 2015).

Interest & Royalties Directive Recast Proposal

To make progress on this 2011 Recast Proposal, the six-monthly rotating Latvian EU Council Presidency (January 1 2015 – June 30 2015) proposed to split up the Commission proposal in order to focus first on incorporating a GAAR clause, similar to the one added in January 2015 to the EU's Parent-Subsidiary Directive (that is, acting as a de minimis rule), while Council work would continue, in the meantime, on other remaining elements of the Directive, including:

  • a minimum effective level of taxation (not foreseen in the Commission's original proposal);and

  • a requirement for member states to inform each other in the event of the GAAR being invoked.

The Latvian presidency suggested that the above elements should be dealt with as part of the Recast Proposal, but it found no real traction on this during the ECOFIN meeting. Germany, France, Austria, Czech Republic, Greece and Italy insisted during the meeting that discussions in the Council should continue on the Interest & Royalties Directive Recast Proposal as a whole.

Bob van der Made (bob.van.der.made@nl.pwc.com)

PwC Brussels

Tel: +31 88 792 3696

Website: www.pwc.com/eudtg

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Spanish-headquartered multinationals lead on reporting quality, while US and Swiss groups lag in the Fair Tax Foundation’s expanded analysis
Former IRS commissioner Danny Werfel joins ITR for a must-listen conversation spanning his time leading the agency, his AI risk framework, and the future of the OECD
Tax and legal services was PwC’s fastest-growing business line last year, helping to put the firm back on a par with its big four rivals
Ex-EY and Hourani & Partners leader Zain Satardien is using flexible staffing and AI-enabled systems to test a leaner model for specialist legal and tax advice
The big four firm is rightfully prioritising transparency and accountability as it seeks to rebuild from its scandal, but a glaring structural issue remains
A recent hiring flurry has taken the firm’s number of partner appointments this year to 121 and put it on track to hit 160 partner target early
The move brings specialist tax and litigation capability to EY as it seeks to close the gap on Baker McKenzie and Venezuela’s leading local firms
The industry’s response to AI requires an unfamiliar ingredient as firms battle to shape their futures
The ambitious big four challenger firm has also appointed ex-RSM partner Brad Ashton to build out its customs and global trade practice
The big four firm allegedly reviewed backdated documents and signed off on accounts that removed hundreds of millions of dollars of Abramovich’s assets
Gift this article