Italy: Italian Cabinet approves the Internationalisation Decree’s tax package: Simplification for CFC and black-list cost rules

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Italy: Italian Cabinet approves the Internationalisation Decree’s tax package: Simplification for CFC and black-list cost rules

foglia.jpg

emma.jpg

Giuliano Foglia


Marco Emma

Among several tax measures introduced by the Italian Cabinet's final draft 'internationalisation' decree (see our Italy update in the June Issue), the following outstanding amendments to 'black-list' costs and CFC rules seem to seize the opportunity to set simpler tax rules for those who intend to invest in Italy, in accordance with the purpose of the ongoing broad tax reform. The draft decree, in fact, simplifies the rules subordinating the deduction of black-list costs to certain tight demonstrations and formalities. Pursuant to the new rules, costs incurred (from fiscal year 2015) to actually acquire goods and services from black-list suppliers would be freely deductible up to the limit of the fair market value of the transaction, determined according to OECD's guidelines. Any transaction value exceeding such arm's-length 'safe harbour' limit shall be deductible only if the taxpayer provides evidence about its effective economic interest in such transaction and about its genuine execution. The existing obligation to demonstrate that the black-list supplier carries out an effective business activity will be lifted. In any case, transactions with black-list suppliers shall be expressly reported in the annual income tax return.

Substantial changes and simplifications have been introduced also in relation to CFC rules. First, the scope of application shall be limited to controlled companies only, while affiliated foreign companies (that is, companies owned for at least 20% or 10% in the case of listed entities) will no longer be subject to CFC legislation. The ruling procedure to obtain exemption from application of CFC rules in relation to foreign subsidiaries shall no longer be mandatory: the Italian parent company shall evaluate the opportunity to ask for an optional ruling for such purposes. Alternatively, existence of the conditions for the exemption (that is, satisfaction of the 'activity' test or the 'subject-to-substantial-tax' test) may be demonstrated also in case of tax audit. In this respect, possession of foreign subsidiaries falling within the scope of the CFC rules will be specifically flagged in the annual tax return.

Finally, according to the decree, Italian parent companies subject to full taxation on dividends and capital gains derived from participations in black-list subsidiaries that were not subject to CFC rules because of their actual industrial or commercial activity, will benefit from an indirect tax credit for foreign taxes paid by the relevant black-list subsidiary, subject to certain circumstances.

Further simplifications and advantages in relation to both the above mentioned tax regimes (black-list costs and CFC) will be granted to companies opting, upon certain conditions, for a new cooperative compliance programme. Taxpayers adopting adequate internal audit procedures to know, monitor and manage their tax risks may, in fact, participate in a cooperative compliance programme to have the opportunity to (i) agree with the Revenue Agency a common evaluation of potential tax risks before filing the tax returns; (ii) enter into quicker and ad-hoc tax ruling procedures (for example, to determine arm's-length value for black-list cost deduction purposes); and (iii) benefit from further tax advantages.

Giuliano Foglia (foglia@virtax.it) andMarco Emma (emma@virtax.it)

Tremonti Vitali Romagnoli Piccardi e Associati

Tel: +39 06 3218022 (Rome); +39 02 58313707 (Milan)

Website: www.virtax.it

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Australia’s Department of Finance will also commission an independent review of KPMG’s governance, culture, ethics and integrity frameworks, it has revealed.
In the second instalment of this two-part series, Jayne Stokes takes a practical approach to navigating the capital v revenue question for UK R&D claims for software development, and shares pointers for businesses
ITR's latest podcast considers how transformational the buyout could be in Ryan's quest for global advisory reach and analyses a recent boom in demand for private client advisory services
The event comes at an important moment for professionals dealing with practical realities related to this practice area
Germany’s dogmatic restriction of third-party investment in tax advisory firms will only serve to slow down innovation and access to justice
The Irish government has been told that it’s spending too much of its corporation tax receipts and should instead focus on running bigger surpluses; plus, the IRS is set to merge tax practitioner offices
A company risks double taxation, penalties and inquiry cost if it submits a form with anomalies under the new system, Asker Ali also tells ITR
Arindam Mitra and Robin Hart examine how aggregate TP rules clash with transaction-level customs rules, creating compliance risks and requiring granular, SKU-level pricing strategies
The scandal has come just three years after the PwC tax leaks controversy and has prompted KPMG’s Australian chief executive to resign
In the first of a two-part series on capital v revenue in R&D, Jayne Stokes explores these key concepts and where UK companies need to tread carefully
Gift this article