Italy: Italy is reviewing the criteria to identify tax havens

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Italy: Italy is reviewing the criteria to identify tax havens

foglia.jpg

dayala.jpg

Giuliano Foglia


Giovanni d’Ayala Valva

The Italian government is pressing ahead with a plan to attract foreign capital and investment. The idea is to make the Italian environment more appealing to investors through measures aimed at promoting economic growth. More specifically, certain measures have been recently approved (for example, the voluntary disclosure programme, patent box regime, research and development tax credit) and others should be introduced in the future either as part of the Investment Compact Bill or in the context of the so called Fiscal Delegation Law (which will, inter alia, review the Italian abuse of law regime, the tax avoidance discipline and introduce the new tax compliance scheme).

In this context, on December 22 2014, the Italian parliament approved the 2015 Stability Law, which, among others, set forth new criteria to identify blacklist countries, in order to confront a recurrent issue for companies working with foreign suppliers.

Indeed, the Italian income tax code requires for Italian entities an additional burden of proof to allow the deduction of costs (expenses and other negative income) deriving from transactions incurred with entities (or professionals) resident or located in certain countries identified in the so called blacklist.

In such respect, 2015 Stability Law revised the criteria to identify blacklist countries introducing as guiding principle the level of exchange of information between the third state and Italy (irrespective of the effective level of taxation in the third state).

Consequently, a new decree of the Minister of Finance will be issued in the near future to amend the previous blacklist, with the aim to delist all the countries that now have an adequate exchange of information with Italy.

In practical terms, such provision will simplify the relationship between Italy and commercial operators previously located in blacklisted countries which have an exchange of information clause in their treaty with Italy, such as Ecuador, Mauritius, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea and United Arab Emirates. Hong Kong could also be removed from the blacklist once the relevant bilateral tax treaty is ratified by the Italian parliament.

The review of blacklist countries is consistent with the recent approach of the OECD to boost tax transparency and to promote automatic sharing of information between tax authorities. In this scenario, the Italian government is close to signing agreements with numerous blacklisted countries (for example, Switzerland) based on OECD standards which, on the one hand, will have the effect to intensify the exchange of data between tax authorities but, on the other hand, should also grant certain benefits for taxpayers in their relationship with the Italian tax authority.

Giuliano Foglia (foglia@virtax.it) and Giovanni d'Ayala Valva (dayala@virtax.it)

Tremonti Vitali Romagnoli Piccardi e Associati

Tel: +39 06 3218022 (Rome); +39 02 58313707 (Milan)

Website: www.virtax.it

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

India’s budget changes goods and services tax rules; UK private school VAT challenge fast-tracked
It is understood that the US has vowed to oppose any outcome from talks taking place at the UN
It’s the second year in a row that RSM’s tax business has posted fee income growth above 10%
Recent guidance from the Indian tax authorities should provide confidence for investors, says Sanjay Sanghvi of Khaitan & Co
Grant Wardell-Johnson also suggests there could be solutions to the friction between the US and the OECD when it comes to pillar two
The president had so far avoided announcing tariffs on the US’s neighbours despite previous threats
The firm brought in three managing directors from EY and Deloitte in Europe; in other news, KPMG’s bid to practise law in US was delayed
One expert argues the ERS would be unlikely to improve taxpayers’ experience unless it comes with additional funding to hire more agents and staff
From pillar two and amount B to Apple’s headline EU Commission dispute, Martin Bonner and Yiwen Ping of Kreston Global argue that 2024’s key TP developments will inform 2025
Holland & Knight, Nelson Mullins and McCarter & English made the joint-most tax partner hires in the US last year, according to annual ITR Talent Tracker data
Gift this article