US Outbound: Final anti-inversion regulations retain bright-line substantial business activities test

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US Outbound: Final anti-inversion regulations retain bright-line substantial business activities test

foley.jpg

mcgrew.jpg

Sean Foley


Landon McGrew

The US Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service recently released final regulations addressing when a foreign corporation's expanded affiliated group (EAG) will be considered to have substantial business activities in a foreign country for purposes of determining whether the foreign corporation is a surrogate foreign corporation within the meaning of the section 7874 anti-inversion rules (TD 9720). The new regulations generally adopt temporary regulations that were issued in 2012 (TD 9592) with certain modifications. As general background, a foreign corporation will be treated as a surrogate foreign corporation with respect to a US corporation (and thus subject to the section 7874 anti-inversion rules) if pursuant to a plan (or a series of related transactions):

  • The foreign corporation acquires (directly or indirectly) substantially all of the assets of a US corporation;

  • After the acquisition, at least 60% of the stock of the foreign corporation is owned by former shareholders of the US corporation by reason of their prior ownership of stock in the US corporation; and

  • After the acquisition, the foreign corporation's EAG does not have substantial business activities in the foreign country in which the foreign corporation is organised.

The 2012 temporary regulations provided a bright-line test for determining whether a foreign corporation's EAG has substantial business activities in the relevant foreign country. Under this bright-line test, an EAG is considered to have substantial business activities in the relevant foreign country only if at least 25% of the group employees, group assets, and group income are located or derived in the relevant foreign country. The final regulations retain this bright-line test, subject to certain modifications described below.

First, the final regulations clarify certain rules for determining the members of a foreign corporation's EAG by providing that an entity that is not a member of the EAG on the acquisition date is not a member of the EAG even if the entity was a member at some earlier point during the testing period. Moreover, members of the EAG are determined by taking into account all transactions related to the acquisition even if they occur after the acquisition date. The final regulations also provide a new partnership look-through rule for determining members of the EAG, and coordinate this rule with the deemed corporation rule which has been retained from the 2012 temporary regulations.

The final regulations also include a modification to the anti-abuse rule in section 7874(c) by providing that any group assets, employees, or income associated with property transferred to an EAG that is part of a plan with a principal purpose of avoiding the purposes of section 7874 are not taken into account in both the numerator and the denominator of each of the substantial business activities tests. Under the temporary regulations, these items were not taken into account in the numerator, but were taken into account in the denominator.

In addition, the final regulations include certain modifications to the application of the specific tests used to determine whether the EAG has substantial business activities, for example whether individuals qualify as employees, when employee compensation is treated as incurred, how mobile assets are treated, and how group income is calculated.

The final regulations apply to acquisitions completed on or after June 3 2015.

The information contained herein is of a general nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. Applicability of the information to specific situations should be determined through consultation with your tax adviser.

This article represents the views of the authors only, and does not necessarily represent the views or professional advice of KPMG LLP.

Sean Foley (sffoley@kpmg.com) and Landon McGrew (lmcgrew@kpmg.com), Washington, DC

KPMG

Tel: +1 202 533 5588

Fax: +1 202 315 3087

Website: www.us.kpmg.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s most interesting stories of the year covered ‘landmark’ legal battles, pillar two, AI’s relationship with transfer pricing and more
Chinwe Odimba-Chapman was announced as Michael Bates’ successor; in other news, a report has found a high level of BEPS compliance among OECD jurisdictions
The tool, which will automatically compute amount B returns, requires “only minimal data inputs”, according to the OECD
The rules are intended to implement the substance of an earlier OECD report in its entirety
While new technology won’t replace the human touch, it could help relieve companies’ staffing issues, EY’s David Helmer and Daren Campbell tell ITR
The firm said the financial growth came from increased demand for its AI services and global tax reform advice
Chrystia Freeland had also been the figurehead of Canada’s controversial digital services tax adoption, which stoked economic tensions with the US
Panama has no official position on pillar two so far and a move to implement in Costa Rica will face rejection, experts tell ITR
The KPMG partner tells ITR about Sri Lanka’s complex and evolving tax landscape, setting legal precedents through client work, and his vision for the future of tax
Overall turnover at the firm also reached a record £8 billion; in other news, Ashurst and Dentons announced senior tax partner hires
Gift this article