Brazil: Changes to the calculation basis and withholding tax for interest on net equity payments

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Changes to the calculation basis and withholding tax for interest on net equity payments

Chin-Michela-100
Conomy-Mark-100

Michela Chin

Mark Conomy

On September 30 2015, the executive branch of the Brazilian Government released Provisional Measure 694/2015 (PM 694). Among other items, PM 694 amends the relevant legislation concerning the withholding tax applicable to payments of interest on net equity (INE) as well as introducing a further limitation in relation to the calculation base for such payments.

By way of background, INE is an alternative way of remunerating shareholders for investments made in Brazilian companies, calculated based on their net equity. INE is conditioned to the existence of profits and deductible up to an amount limited to the greater of:

  • 50% of net income before corporate income tax (and after social contribution on net income) for the current year; or

  • 50% of retained earnings and profit reserves.

Such payments of INE are determined based on the pro-rated calculation of the company's net equity accounts (with certain adjustments) multiplied by the long-term interest rate (TJLP). Before the introduction of PM 694, INE payments have generally been subject to a 15% rate of withholding tax, unless the recipients are located in a tax haven, in which case the withholding tax rate should generally be 25%.

Pursuant to PM 694, the calculation basis for INE payments should consider a pro-rated calculation of the company's net equity accounts multiplied by TJLP or 5% per year, whichever is lower. This limitation is potentially significant given the TJLP for September 2015 was 6.5% (increasing to 7% for October 2015 to December 2015). Further, the PM also increases the withholding tax rate to 18% (previously 15%). For foreign shareholders that cannot take advantage of the credit for the withholding tax, this increase could result in a further tax leakage. Treaty benefits should be considered.

It is important to emphasise that a provisional measure is a provisionary law, issued by the executive branch of the Brazilian Government, which has authority of law until it is acted upon by the Brazilian Congress within a prescribed 60-day period. If Congress does not act within this initial period, then it expires unless it is extended for an additional 60-days.

PM 694 entered into effect on the date of publication, however the changes outlined above should only take effect from January 1 2016.

It is important to note that amendments to provisional measures during the process of conversion into law are very common, therefore it will be important to monitor the developments of PM 694 during the conversion process.

Michela Chin (michela.chin@br.pwc.com) and Mark Conomy (conomy.mark@br.pwc.com)
PwC

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

A global tax framework may not materialise anytime soon, but a common set of principles is becoming increasingly necessary, Rudolf Winkenius also tells ITR
Kingsley Napley’s claimants are arguing that taxing the provision of education breaches the European Convention on Human Rights
While pillar two can progress without the US, it won’t reach the same heights without American involvement, argues Renáta Bláhová, founding partner of BMB Partners Taxand
There are unanswered questions as to how foreign investors could reclaim money via tax credits, advisers suggested
Amid an ever-changing tax environment, India’s advisory market is bustling with competition ahead of the 2025 World Tax rankings and ITR Awards
The deal comes after PwC had accused Paul McNab of using confidential information; in other news, McDermott hired a new London tax head from a US rival
Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Cultural nuances could account for tax advisers’ perceived poor cost management, a local partner told ITR
Gift this article