Brazil: Changes concerning the capital gains tax rates for non-residents

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Changes concerning the capital gains tax rates for non-residents

Chin-Michela-100
Conomy-Mark-100

Michela Chin

Mark Conomy

Provisional measure 692/2015 (PM 692) was released by the executive branch of the Brazilian government on September 22 2015. Among other items, PM 692 amends the tax rates applicable to individuals and certain companies on the capital gain deriving from the sale of assets and rights of any nature.

In principle, non-resident companies are subject to the rules applicable for individuals when calculating their Brazilian capital gains tax liability under the current law. Therefore, although PM 692 is, in substance, addressed toward individuals in Brazil, the implications extend to non-resident companies.

Broadly, the previous rules provided that such capital gains should be subject to tax at the rate of 15%. Pursuant to PM 692, the rates should apply as follows:

  • 15% in relation to the portion of gains that do not surpass BRL 1 million ($260,000);

  • 20% in relation to the portion of gains that exceed BRL 1 million and do not surpass BRL 5 million;

  • 25% in relation to the portion of gains that exceed BRL 5 million and do not surpass BRL 20 million; and

  • 30% in relation to the portion of gains that surpass BRL 20 million.

In the event of alienation of a part of the same asset or right as from the second transaction/operation, the capital gain should be calculated with capital gains from previous transactions in order to determine the relevant tax, deducting the amount of tax paid on the previous transaction(s).

Furthermore, pursuant to PM 692, capital gains derived by a company, arising on the alienation of non-current assets or rights, should also be subject to the above rates – except for companies which apply the actual, presumed or arbitrary profit methods (being the key methods of calculating tax for Brazilian entities).

PM 692 enters into effect on the date of publication, however the rates outlined above for capital gains taxation would only take effect from January 1 2016.

Finally, there have already been several issues identified with the current text, such as how the rules should apply to non-residents located in 'tax havens' (subject to withholding tax at 25%), with further issues likely to be raised as the measure is analysed in greater detail.

Michela Chin (michela.chin@br.pwc.com) and Mark Conomy (conomy.mark@br.pwc.com)

PwC

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While it’s great that the OECD is alive to multinationals’ fears of being caught in a compliance trap, the ‘common understanding’ illustrates a worrying lack of readiness
Rising demand for specialist expertise has fuelled the growth in tax partner headcounts, Cain Dwyer found; in other news, Switzerland has been urged to reconsider pillar two
An OECD report on the taxation of the digital economy is expected by the end of 2026, according to the group of nations
Trophy assets are evolving from personal indulgences to structured investments, prompting family offices to prioritise tax efficiency, governance discipline, and cross-border compliance
As demand for complex, cross-border private client counsel spikes, Patrick McCormick sees opportunity in starting from scratch
As part of an exclusive global alliance, KPMG will become one of Anthropic’s ‘preferred consultants’ for private equity
In the second part of this series, the focus shifts to how taxpayers can manage ongoing risks across the lifecycle of cross-border structures
Jurisdictions have moved to ensure that multinationals are not punished for late GIR filings due to a lack of available filing portals or exchange relationships
HMRC’s push for unified tax adviser registration won’t prevent every instance of improper conduct, but it is good for taxpayers and the UK’s reputation
Elsewhere, the UAE’s tax office has issued an update on registration penalties and two firms have been busy making lateral hires
Gift this article