Switzerland: How Switzerland intends to implement BEPS

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: How Switzerland intends to implement BEPS

Habermacher-Hans-Rudolf-100
Stocker-Raoul-100

Hans Rudolf Habermacher

Raoul Stocker

Switzerland plans to implement the country-by-country reporting (CbCR) and exchange of information provisions recommended by the OECD as part of its final package of measures to counter tax base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS).

On October 5 the OECD presented its final BEPS action reports. In parallel, the Swiss Government presented its plans on how it intends to implement any compulsory changes which have not already been incorporated in the latest draft of the Swiss Corporate Tax Reform III (CTR III). The two major changes have been announced whereby Swiss-based multinationals would be requested to prepare and submit reporting on a country-by-country basis (BEPS action 13) and indicating that Switzerland intends to participate in the exchange of information between tax authorities on taxpayer-specific rulings (BEPS action 5).

Both changes will require an alteration of the Swiss legislation. Given the nature of the Swiss federal parliamentary process, the proposed legislations will be submitted to parliament in 2016 and are unlikely to enter into force before 2018. For CbCR in particular, the government plans to give companies and the tax administration sufficient time to implement mechanisms to deal with the new reporting requirement.

The planned timing for CBCR will mean that Switzerland cannot meet the proposed timetable of the OECD. As a result, Swiss-based multinational companies would have to resort to the alternative approach proposed by the OECD and submit their reporting via one of their group entities located in another country until the legislative process to allow this information to be submitted in Switzerland is complete.

Switzerland has a long-lasting tradition that companies may seek unilateral tax rulings which provide them with a unique level of certainty for their tax planning. By participating in the exchange of information the Swiss tax administration in future will need to provide information about existing rulings to foreign tax administrations upon request. The Swiss government has indicated, however, that it would only share information on tax rulings which are still valid on the date when the planned legislative change will take effect.

Besides the planned legislative changes, taxpayers should be aware of the fact that in the absence of specific transfer pricing legislation the Swiss tax administration refers to the OECD transfer pricing guidelines when assessing taxpayers. In this respect it is important to note that reference will automatically be made to the amended OECD TP guidelines when assessing future tax years (BEPS actions 8 – 10 and 13).

We recommend that companies review and assess possible effects of the BEPS initiative as well as the planned legislative changes on their tax and transfer pricing planning and take appropriate measures as necessary.

Hans Rudolf Habermacher (hhabermacher@deloitte.ch) and Raoul Stocker (rstocker@deloitte.ch)
Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 6327 and +41 58 279 6271

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The event comes at an important moment for professionals dealing with practical realities related to this practice area
Germany’s dogmatic restriction of third-party investment in tax advisory firms will only serve to slow down innovation and access to justice
The Irish government has been told that it’s spending too much of its corporation tax receipts and should instead focus on running bigger surpluses; plus, the IRS is set to merge tax practitioner offices
A company risks double taxation, penalties and inquiry cost if it submits a form with anomalies under the new system, Asker Ali also tells ITR
Arindam Mitra and Robin Hart examine how aggregate TP rules clash with transaction-level customs rules, creating compliance risks and requiring granular, SKU-level pricing strategies
The scandal has come just three years after the PwC tax leaks controversy and has prompted KPMG’s Australian chief executive to resign
In the first of a two-part series on capital v revenue in R&D, Jayne Stokes explores these key concepts and where UK companies need to tread carefully
Magnus Pantzar is set to join as managing director after spending nearly a decade as EQT’s global head of tax
The OECD’s project was up for debate as Matt Williams spoke to ITR following BDO’s tax strategist survey, which uncovered increased complexity and costs among multinationals
The recent spree of firm mergers and acquisitions proves that geographic scale is the name of the game
Gift this article