India: Exclusion of overseas dividend from indirect transfer provisions

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

India: Exclusion of overseas dividend from indirect transfer provisions

nayak.jpg

jain.jpg

Rajendra Nayak


Aastha Jain

Under the Indian Tax Law (ITL), income arising from any asset in India or from transfer of a capital asset situated in India would be taxable in India. In 2012, the ITL was retroactively amended to introduce provisions for the taxation of indirect transfer (IDT provisions) under which it was clarified that an asset or a capital asset being any share in a foreign company shall be deemed to be situated in India, if such shares derive their value substantially from the assets located in India. Accordingly, transfer of such deemed asset was taxable in India. The legislative intent of such provision was to tax gains having an economic nexus with India, irrespective of the mode of realisation of such gains. Apprehensions were raised by various stakeholders on the overreaching scope of deeming fiction under the IDT provisions, which deems the shares of a foreign company to be situated in India. Concern was raised that the provisions would result in taxation in India of dividend income declared by such foreign company outside India. This was perceived as an unintended consequence of the IDT provisions.

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), the apex administrative body for taxation in India, recently issued a circular (Circular 4 of 2015) to clarify that:

  • the IDT provisions would trigger tax for the transaction which has the effect of transferring, directly or indirectly, the underlying assets located in India, as income accruing or arising in India; and

  • declaration of dividend by a foreign company outside India does not have an effect of transfer of any underlying asset located in India. Accordingly, such dividend paid by foreign company would not be taxable in India by virtue of the IDT provisions of the ITL.

This clarification from the CBDT addresses the concern which had arisen on account of the wide scope of the IDT provisions. This is also in line with the intent of the present Indian Government to provide certainty and stability in India's tax regime.

Rajendra Nayak (rajendra.nayak@in.ey.com) and Aastha Jain (aastha.jain@in.ey.com)

Ernst & Young

Tel: +91 80 6727 5275

Website: www.ey.com/india

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Just one member objected to the multilateral convention on amount A, citing concerns over amount B
Jaime Carey wishes to broaden the IBA’s visibility in Africa and Asia during his tenure
Baker McKenzie’s survey of 600 corporate counsel also found that global employee mobility issues were a key driver of tax controversy
Ken Kies has been named as assistant secretary for tax policy; in other news, Baker McKenzie has boosted its US tax practice with a double hire
The increasing sophistication of India’s taxation system has led to complexity across tax treaty benefits, permanent establishments, transfer pricing and more, say Sanjay Sanghvi and Ujjval Gangwal of Khaitan & Co
Multinationals will continue to shift profits out of Slovakia to EU member states despite pillar two’s implementation, according to the report
The firm’s final report outlined new mandatory staff training designed to enhance ethical conduct; meanwhile former PwC Australia partner Wayne Plummer has been cleared of wrongdoing
Goods and services key to Africa’s tax revenue; electronic exemptions come to Europe; UK private school VAT challenge reaches High Court
The private client practice joining Withers comprises eight lawyers, three paralegals and additional staff members
Overall tax revenues grew by over 10% in 2024 when discounting the 'distorted' Apple payout, the Irish government said
Gift this article