Switzerland: Spontaneous exchange of tax rulings

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Spontaneous exchange of tax rulings

schreiber.jpg

parmentier.jpg

René Schreiber


Veronique Parmentier

Could multinationals, in the future, see their Swiss tax rulings sent to foreign jurisdictions by the Swiss authorities? In 2013 Switzerland signed the Convention on Multilateral Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters (the Convention), which provides for spontaneous exchange of information. In January 2015 the Swiss Federal Council initiated a decree allowing ratification of the Convention and the amendment of the Swiss law on administrative assistance to introduce spontaneous exchange of information into domestic law. A draft decree was submitted to the parliament in June 2015 and first exchanges of information are expected as from January 1 2018. The question remains as to whether these exchanges will also include Swiss advanced tax rulings.

Article 7, paragraph 1 of the Convention lists the cases in which a jurisdiction should spontaneously transmit information to another jurisdiction. The OECD Manual on the implementation of exchange of information for tax purposes provides additional guidance regarding such circumstances. However, none of these documents refer explicitly to tax rulings.

The Swiss Federal Council will issue a decree providing more details regarding the obligations resulting from the Convention, and the tax authorities will issue some practical directives that will take into account the practice in other jurisdictions as well as international standards. Based on the current parliamentary work, this includes the framework being developed by the Forum on Harmful Tax Practices under the BEPS umbrella for the spontaneous exchange of tax rulings.

Therefore, it has to be expected that any tax ruling relating to a cross-border transaction involving movable income, which benefits from a preferential regime and a low effective rate of taxation, would fall under the scope of the new spontaneous exchange of information. It is, at this stage, less clear for other tax rulings. Many current tax rulings including the taxation of mixed companies, holding companies or principal structures will most likely fall into the first category.

René Schreiber (rschreiber@deloitte.ch) and Veronique Parmentier (vparmentier@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 7216 and +41 58 279 7856

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and US President Donald Trump have agreed that the countries will look to conclude a deal by July 21, 2025
The firm’s lack of transparency regarding its tax leaks scandal should see the ban extended beyond June 30, senators Deborah O’Neill and Barbara Pocock tell ITR
Despite posing significant administrative hurdles, digital services taxes remain ‘the best way forward’ for emerging economies, says Neil Kelley, COO of Ascoria
A ‘joint understanding’ among G7 countries that ‘defends American interests’ is set to be announced, Scott Bessent claimed
The ‘big four’ firm’s inaugural annual report unveiled a sharp drop in profits for 2024; in other news, Baker McKenzie and Perkins Coie expanded their US tax benches
Representatives from the two countries focused on TP as they met this week to evaluate progress under a previously signed agreement – it is understood
The UK accountancy firm’s transfer pricing lead tells ITR about his expat lifestyle, taking risks, and what makes tax cool
Dolphin Drilling intends to discuss the final liability amount and manner of settlement with HM Revenue and Customs
Winning the case against the 20% VAT imposition was always going to be an uphill challenge for the claimants, UK tax advisers argue
A ‘paradigm shift’ in Chile’s tax enforcement requires compliance architecture built on proactive governance, strategic documentation and active monitoring of judicial developments
Gift this article