US Inbound: IRS international practice units

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US Inbound: IRS international practice units

fuller.jpg

forst.jpg

Jim Fuller


David Forst

As a part of the IRS Large Business & International Division's knowledge management efforts, international practice units have been developed through internal collaboration and serve as both aids and training materials on international tax issues. They are not official pronouncements of law, and cannot be used, cited or relied upon as such. The IRS issued two new inbound international practice units in July 2015: non-services FDAP [fixed or determinable, annual or periodical] income; and branch-level interest tax concepts. The practice unit dealing with branch-level interest tax concepts provides a pretty good analysis of the rules under § 884(f). A branch-level interest tax is composed of two parts: a withholding tax imposed on interest paid by a US branch to a foreign person (referred to as branch interest) and a tax imposed on the excess of the foreign corporation's interest allocable to income connected to effectively connected income over its branch interest (referred to as excess interest). This practice unit would provide a good review for someone interested in understanding § 884(f).

The non-services FDAP income practice unit focuses on royalty income as an example. The IRS examiner is directed to determine whether the foreign corporation licensor (FC) has an office in the US through which it licenses software to other customers. The IRS examiner is directed to determine whether FC has employees in the US who provide aftermarket technical services related to the software. These are important facts in analysing whether the royalty income would be treated as effectively connected with a US trade or business. The IRS examiner is also told to confirm that the software is licensed and not sold (sale of copyrighted articles). The practice unit provides a reasonably thorough approach to auditing these transactions.

The practice units make references to IPNs (international practice networks). These are IRS employee groups that network in designated areas to broaden, enhance, and share their experiences. They are, more or less, groups of experts on designated issues.

The non-services FDAP income practice unit states that the examiner should consult with the Repatriation/Withholding IPN to determine when the taxpayer's activities create effectively connected income. It also states that the examiner, on a different point, should consult with IRS counsel and the Jurisdiction-to-tax IPN for guidance. The branch-level practice unit refers the examiner to the Treaties IPN for assistance in determining general treaty eligibility including the qualifications under a limitation on benefits article.

Jim Fuller (jpfuller@fenwick.com) and David Forst (dforst@fenwick.com)

Fenwick & West

Tel: +1 650 335 7205; +1 650 335 7274

Website: www.fenwick.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The proposed Block TP Assessment could provide taxpayers with long-term arm’s-length price certainty and reduce admin headaches, Sanjay Sanghvi of Khaitan & Co writes
India’s budget changes goods and services tax rules; UK private school VAT challenge fast-tracked
It is understood that the US has vowed to oppose any outcome from talks taking place at the UN
It’s the second year in a row that RSM’s tax business has posted fee income growth above 10%
Recent guidance from the Indian tax authorities should provide confidence for investors, says Sanjay Sanghvi of Khaitan & Co
Grant Wardell-Johnson also suggests there could be solutions to the friction between the US and the OECD when it comes to pillar two
The president had so far avoided announcing tariffs on the US’s neighbours despite previous threats
The firm brought in three managing directors from EY and Deloitte in Europe; in other news, KPMG’s bid to practise law in US was delayed
One expert argues the ERS would be unlikely to improve taxpayers’ experience unless it comes with additional funding to hire more agents and staff
From pillar two and amount B to Apple’s headline EU Commission dispute, Martin Bonner and Yiwen Ping of Kreston Global argue that 2024’s key TP developments will inform 2025
Gift this article