Albania: Albanian transfer pricing regulations

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Albania: Albanian transfer pricing regulations

sagianni.jpg

lena.jpg

Anastasia Sagianni


Erion Lena

Transfer pricing rules have been present for more than a decade in the Albanian Corporate Income Tax (CIT) Law, but specific and detailed regulations on the application of these rules have been published in the Official Journal No 70, dated May 20 2014. The recent changes have totally transformed Article 36 of the Law on Income Tax (No. 8438, dated December 28 1998) by adding seven more articles related to specific rules and actions.

Who is affected?

Companies and groups of companies with related party transactions are affected by transfer pricing rules.

Related party definition

An entity is considered a related party if there is a possibility of exercising control over, or exerting considerable influence on, business decisions made. The direct or indirect possession of at least 50% of the shares in capital shall mean that control over the taxpayer is possible.

The case of direct or indirect possession of at least 50% of the voting rights is considered as having an influence on business decisions.

Type of transactions

The type of transactions subject to transfer pricing are: product sales; product acquisition; lendings; borrowings; royalties; management fee payment; provision of management services; cost-sharing within the group; research and development activities; provision of other services; and use of other services.

Transfer pricing methods

The taxpayer should choose one of the methods described in the OECD guidelines. Taxpayers should also describe the decisive reasons for the determination regarding the method used for the reconciliation of the transfer prices with the arm's-length principle for the transactions carried out with the associate enterprises.

The taxpayer should choose one of the following methods:

  • Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method;

  • Resale Price Method;

  • Cost Plus Method;

  • Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM); or

  • Profit Split Method.

The taxpayer can use another method only if none of the above methods can be reasonably applied.

Transfer pricing audit and penalties

In case of a potential tax audit, the Tax Administration should perform the same transfer pricing method used by the taxpayer.

Another important change is introduced in the Law no. 9920, dated May 19 2008 "On Tax Procedures" with penalties related to transfer pricing being added (Article 115/1). Previously, no provision or penalties regarding transfer pricing were in force.

Reporting deadlines

Transfer pricing documentation is to be submitted to the Tax Authorities in Albania on an annual basis by filing a "controlled transaction report", the submission timeframe of which shall be determined by the Ministry of Finance.

Advance pricing agreements (APAs)

Taxpayers that carry out transactions with related parties may address the tax authorities to obtain an APA regarding the conditions and methods of determining the transfer pricing. Specific announcements will be issued, related to APAs, by the Ministry of Finance.

Anastasia Sagianni (anastasia.sagianni@eurofast.eu) and Erion Lena (erion.lena@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Global, Tirana Office

Tel: +355 69 533 7456

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

India’s budget changes goods and services tax rules; UK private school VAT challenge fast-tracked
It is understood that the US has vowed to oppose any outcome from talks taking place at the UN
It’s the second year in a row that RSM’s tax business has posted fee income growth above 10%
Recent guidance from the Indian tax authorities should provide confidence for investors, says Sanjay Sanghvi of Khaitan & Co
Grant Wardell-Johnson also suggests there could be solutions to the friction between the US and the OECD when it comes to pillar two
The president had so far avoided announcing tariffs on the US’s neighbours despite previous threats
The firm brought in three managing directors from EY and Deloitte in Europe; in other news, KPMG’s bid to practise law in US was delayed
One expert argues the ERS would be unlikely to improve taxpayers’ experience unless it comes with additional funding to hire more agents and staff
From pillar two and amount B to Apple’s headline EU Commission dispute, Martin Bonner and Yiwen Ping of Kreston Global argue that 2024’s key TP developments will inform 2025
Holland & Knight, Nelson Mullins and McCarter & English made the joint-most tax partner hires in the US last year, according to annual ITR Talent Tracker data
Gift this article