Germany: Global-China cash pooling and transfer pricing implications

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Global-China cash pooling and transfer pricing implications

andresen.jpg

tao.jpg

Ulf Andresen


Yu Tao

The past year saw major movements towards liberalising the currency of the world's second largest economy, the Chinese Yuan or Renminbi (CNY). Such movements include the simplification of cross-border Yuan transaction procedures by the People's Bank of China, guidance for the Shanghai Pilot Free Trade Zone, and the opening up of global CNY offshore centres including Frankfurt. German multinationals, some with huge accumulated CNY cash surpluses in China have had difficulty with cash repatriation. They now have the opportunity to use their surplus cash by connecting their Chinese and global cash pools. Successful pilot cases have been launched both within and outside the Shanghai Pilot Free Trade Zone (entities in this zone enjoy simplified procedures) and now banks are offering cash pool linkage as a product.

Transfer pricing challenges arise from the determination of arm's-length cash-pooling interest rates for CNY, mainly because of the co-existence of onshore and offshore interest and currency exchange systems. The two markets deliver different third-party benchmarks and mixed opportunity costs for the fund providers. On the other hand, fund users are able to borrow alternative free-trade currencies at lower interest rates. Here the rate difference is primarily driven by the evolving outlook of CNY exchange rates. This situation is further complicated by the mismatched expectations of the German and Chinese tax authorities on intercompany financing interest rates, built up from their historical experience. German multinationals that are interested in exploring this cash-pooling mechanism need to consider a number of transfer pricing factors, including the selection of benchmarked markets, identification of opportunity costs, hedging policy and costs, appropriate documentation, as well as the implication of the Chinese thin-capitalisation and German interest limitation rules.

Ulf Andresen (ulf.andresen@de.pwc.com)

Tel: +49 69 9585 3551
Yu Tao (yu.tao@de.pwc.com)

Tel: +49 69 9585 6408

PwC

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

India’s budget changes goods and services tax rules; UK private school VAT challenge fast-tracked
It is understood that the US has vowed to oppose any outcome from talks taking place at the UN
It’s the second year in a row that RSM’s tax business has posted fee income growth above 10%
Recent guidance from the Indian tax authorities should provide confidence for investors, says Sanjay Sanghvi of Khaitan & Co
Grant Wardell-Johnson also suggests there could be solutions to the friction between the US and the OECD when it comes to pillar two
The president had so far avoided announcing tariffs on the US’s neighbours despite previous threats
The firm brought in three managing directors from EY and Deloitte in Europe; in other news, KPMG’s bid to practise law in US was delayed
One expert argues the ERS would be unlikely to improve taxpayers’ experience unless it comes with additional funding to hire more agents and staff
From pillar two and amount B to Apple’s headline EU Commission dispute, Martin Bonner and Yiwen Ping of Kreston Global argue that 2024’s key TP developments will inform 2025
Holland & Knight, Nelson Mullins and McCarter & English made the joint-most tax partner hires in the US last year, according to annual ITR Talent Tracker data
Gift this article