Germany: Global-China cash pooling and transfer pricing implications

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Global-China cash pooling and transfer pricing implications

andresen.jpg

tao.jpg

Ulf Andresen


Yu Tao

The past year saw major movements towards liberalising the currency of the world's second largest economy, the Chinese Yuan or Renminbi (CNY). Such movements include the simplification of cross-border Yuan transaction procedures by the People's Bank of China, guidance for the Shanghai Pilot Free Trade Zone, and the opening up of global CNY offshore centres including Frankfurt. German multinationals, some with huge accumulated CNY cash surpluses in China have had difficulty with cash repatriation. They now have the opportunity to use their surplus cash by connecting their Chinese and global cash pools. Successful pilot cases have been launched both within and outside the Shanghai Pilot Free Trade Zone (entities in this zone enjoy simplified procedures) and now banks are offering cash pool linkage as a product.

Transfer pricing challenges arise from the determination of arm's-length cash-pooling interest rates for CNY, mainly because of the co-existence of onshore and offshore interest and currency exchange systems. The two markets deliver different third-party benchmarks and mixed opportunity costs for the fund providers. On the other hand, fund users are able to borrow alternative free-trade currencies at lower interest rates. Here the rate difference is primarily driven by the evolving outlook of CNY exchange rates. This situation is further complicated by the mismatched expectations of the German and Chinese tax authorities on intercompany financing interest rates, built up from their historical experience. German multinationals that are interested in exploring this cash-pooling mechanism need to consider a number of transfer pricing factors, including the selection of benchmarked markets, identification of opportunity costs, hedging policy and costs, appropriate documentation, as well as the implication of the Chinese thin-capitalisation and German interest limitation rules.

Ulf Andresen (ulf.andresen@de.pwc.com)

Tel: +49 69 9585 3551
Yu Tao (yu.tao@de.pwc.com)

Tel: +49 69 9585 6408

PwC

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s most interesting stories of the year covered ‘landmark’ legal battles, pillar two, AI’s relationship with transfer pricing and more
Chinwe Odimba-Chapman was announced as Michael Bates’ successor; in other news, a report has found a high level of BEPS compliance among OECD jurisdictions
The tool, which will automatically compute amount B returns, requires “only minimal data inputs”, according to the OECD
The rules are intended to implement the substance of an earlier OECD report in its entirety
While new technology won’t replace the human touch, it could help relieve companies’ staffing issues, EY’s David Helmer and Daren Campbell tell ITR
The firm said the financial growth came from increased demand for its AI services and global tax reform advice
Chrystia Freeland had also been the figurehead of Canada’s controversial digital services tax adoption, which stoked economic tensions with the US
Panama has no official position on pillar two so far and a move to implement in Costa Rica will face rejection, experts tell ITR
The KPMG partner tells ITR about Sri Lanka’s complex and evolving tax landscape, setting legal precedents through client work, and his vision for the future of tax
Overall turnover at the firm also reached a record £8 billion; in other news, Ashurst and Dentons announced senior tax partner hires
Gift this article