Switzerland: Swiss cantons announce lower headline tax rates in anticipation of Swiss Corporate Tax Reform III

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Swiss cantons announce lower headline tax rates in anticipation of Swiss Corporate Tax Reform III

hess.jpg

kistler.jpg

Jackie Hess


Jacques Kistler

Switzerland is contemplating a comprehensive corporate tax reform – Swiss Corporate Tax Reform III – which would phase out certain tax regimes, such as the holding, mixed and domiciliary company regimes in the 2018 – 2020 timeframe and replace these regimes with a variety of other measures. The overriding objective of this comprehensive tax reform is to secure and strengthen the tax competitiveness and attractiveness of Switzerland as an international location for corporations.

Several measures to replace the holding, mixed and domiciliary company regimes that would accomplish the dual goals of tax competitiveness and international acceptance are being considered, in particular:

  • A licence box for income arising from the exploitation and use of intellectual property;

  • A notional interest deduction on equity; and

  • A general reduction of the headline corporate tax rate (effective combined federal/cantonal/communal rate).

Twelve Swiss cantons are now considering a reduction of their headline tax rate (effective combined federal/cantonal/communal rate). The following cantons already announced a reduction of their headline corporate tax rates: Vaud to 13.8%, Geneva to 13%, Neuchâtel to 15.6%, Fribourg to 15%, and Zug to approximately 12%.

In addition, the following cantons in Switzerland with a tax rate that already stands below 15% have stated they will, or are expected to, keep their low tax rates: Schwyz: 11.7 % (communities of Freienbach/Wollerau), Lucerne: 12.3% (11.3% in the lowest taxed community), Appenzell Ausserrhoden: 12.7%, Nidwalden: 12.7%, Obwalden: 12.7%, and Appenzell Innerrhoden: 14.3%.

As indicated above, the lowering of the headline tax rate is just one of several measures that are being contemplated to ensure the competitiveness and attractiveness of Switzerland for corporations once certain special tax regimes phase out in the 2018 to 2020 timeframe.

Jackie Hess (jahess@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 6312

Jacques Kistler (jkistler@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 8164

René Zulauf (rzulauf@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 6359

Deloitte

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

New research, which suggests LLMs can silently corrupt complex documents, should alert tax and legal teams relying on AI to handle iterative drafting and compliance workflows
Maintaining increased funding for HMRC is a ‘high possibility’ if he becomes PM, ITR has also heard
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2026 Europe Tax Awards
The firm has hired a team of private client lawyers from Withers to launch in New York and Connecticut, though ITR analysis suggests it faces stiff competition
The ability of tax authorities to receive and analyse data is becoming ‘quite advanced’, warns Stuart Lang, head of EY’s compliance co-sourcing solution
The Court of Appeal ruling clarifies that treaty benefits are not abusive where transactions are commercially driven, providing greater certainty on “main purpose” anti-avoidance tests
Despite the Netherlands featuring an unusual concentration of World Tax-ranked technology-led providers, sources believe there’s a long way to go to challenge the established players
Ethics seems to be playing a subservient role to an entitlement culture borne out of a pervasive ‘revenue at all costs’ mentality at the big four
Historical World Tax data suggests the ‘largest law firm merger in history’ may not pose a serious threat to the world's leading tax practices
The repeal of Libya’s statute of limitations and tougher enforcement leave taxpayers navigating a high-stakes choice between conciliation and litigation
Gift this article