Luxembourg: Luxembourg signs new protocol to treaty with France

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Luxembourg: Luxembourg signs new protocol to treaty with France

fister.jpg

schmitz.jpg

Emilie Fister


Samantha Schmitz-Merle

The long awaited protocol to the France-Luxembourg double tax treaty (DTT) was signed on September 5 2014. The protocol amends the rules applicable to capital gains on the sale of shares or other rights in real estate companies and allocates the right to tax these gains to the source country. The protocol provides that capital gains derived by a resident of Luxembourg or France from the alienation of shares, units or other rights in companies, trusts or any other entities that derive directly or indirectly more than 50% of their value from real estate assets located in the other contracting state are taxable in the source country (the country in which the real estate is located). In other words, these gains are taxed in the same way as real estate income. Real estate assets allocated to the business activity of an enterprise are excluded from this clause.

So far, under the existing DTT provisions, capital gains realised on the sale of shares in real estate companies were taxed at the place of the residency of the seller. In other words, gains derived by a Luxembourg company from a French property company holding French real estate were exempt in France and only taxable in Luxembourg. In Luxembourg, they could possibly benefit from the Luxembourg participation exemption regime. With the new provisions of the protocol, capital gains derived by a Luxembourg company from a French property company will become taxable in France.

Furthermore, particular attention has to be paid to the wording of this new provision. The wording goes beyond the recommendations of the OECD in its Model Tax Convention. While the latter covers only capital gains on the alienation of shares or comparable interests, the protocol covers shares as well as any other rights.

The amendment to the France-Luxembourg DTT will require a careful review of existing investment structures in French real estate so as to mitigate any potential adverse tax consequences. If both countries manage to complete the ratification procedures before year-end, the protocol will enter into force on January 1 2015, which means that clients with real estate investment structures in France or which plan to invest in French real estate should seek advice from their tax adviser quickly.

Emilie Fister (emilie.fister@atoz.lu) and Samantha Schmitz-Merle (samantha.merle@atoz.lu)

ATOZ – Taxand Luxembourg

Tel: +352 26 940 263 and +352 26 940 235

Website: www.atoz.lu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In the first of a two-part series on capital v revenue in R&D, Jayne Stokes explores these key concepts and where UK companies need to tread carefully
Magnus Pantzar is set to join as managing director after spending nearly a decade as EQT’s global head of tax
The OECD’s project was up for debate as Matt Williams spoke to ITR following BDO’s tax strategist survey, which uncovered increased complexity and costs among multinationals
Sponsored by Deloitte
Sameer Nurmohamed, partner, Deloitte Legal Canada
Sponsored by Deloitte
George Ankomah, partner, Tax & Regulatory Services, Deloitte Africa (Ghana)
The recent spree of firm mergers and acquisitions proves that geographic scale is the name of the game
The big four spin-off firm becomes Taxand’s second UK member; in other news, Haynes Boone launched a UK tax practice
Sponsored by Deloitte Luxembourg
Jean-Michel Henry and Mona El-Begawi of Deloitte Luxembourg examine the complexities created by timing differences in Luxembourg, EU, and OECD tax regimes
Stephanie Pantelidaki’s economic expertise will give Norton Rose Fulbright’s other teams ‘extra firepower,’ she says
Sponsored by MFA Legal & Tech
Samuel Fernandes de Almeida of MFA Legal & Tech assesses whether Portugal’s 7.5% surcharge on non-residents aligns with the EU’s free movement of capital principle and passes the proportionality test
Gift this article