Canada: Canada’s 2014 budget eliminates tax benefits of immigration trusts

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


Canada: Canada’s 2014 budget eliminates tax benefits of immigration trusts

leopardi.jpg

carbone.jpg

John Leopardi


Alexandra Carbone

The government announced in Canada's 2014 budget that it would be introducing new measures to further prevent the use of non-resident trusts to avoid Canadian income tax, notably the proposed elimination of the Canadian tax benefits of immigration trusts. Where a Canadian resident contributes property to a non-resident trust, the trust may be deemed to be a resident of Canada for Canadian tax purposes. Before the budget, an exemption from the deemed-resident trust rule was available where the contributor was an individual who had resided in Canada for a total period of not more than 60 months; non-resident trusts which fell within this exemption were referred to as immigration trusts. Where a trust qualified for the 60-month exemption, it would not be subject to Canadian tax on its foreign-source income for the relevant period. Whereas individuals resident in Canada are normally subject to tax on their worldwide income, the 60-month exemption essentially allowed individuals immigrating to Canada to shelter their foreign source investment income from Canadian tax for up to five years by establishing a non-resident trust and transferring their income-producing assets to the trust prior.

As a result of the 60-month tax exemption, Canadian resident beneficiaries of immigration trusts indirectly obtained a tax benefit that was not available to other Canadian residents not earning income through immigration trusts. The Canadian government stated in the budget, "the 60-month exemption raises tax fairness, tax integrity and tax neutrality concerns".

The proposal amends the non-resident trust rules to remove the 60-month exemption for immigration trusts, generally for taxation years ending on or after February 11 2014. Consequently, an immigration trust will be deemed resident in Canada and subject to taxation on its worldwide income starting in 2015. Limited relief phase-in rules apply in particular circumstances. Individuals who immigrated to Canada and established an immigration trust arrangement should revisit their tax planning in light of the proposed measures.

John Leopardi (john.leopardi@blakes.com)

Tel: +1 514 982 5030; +1 514 982 5030
Alexandra Carbone (alexandra.carbone@blakes.com)

Tel: +1 514 982 5034

Blake, Cassels & Graydon

Website: www.blakes.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The recently formed firm has taken a break from hiring EY talent to expand its transactional tax and tax technology capabilities
The AI platform, founded last year by two school friends, is partnering with challenger firms like Unity Advisory and A&M Tax to launch its own assault on the AI tax market
Not only has Aurtus received recognition from ITR in the past, but its founder was both a partner at KPMG and co-founder of Dhruva Advisors
Clients care more about considered counsel than rapid media-friendly soundbites, says Matthew Gilleard, associate director at Infinite
It was also a memorable night for Galicia, KPMG, Skadden and Pinheiro Neto, all of which scooped major awards at a gala ceremony in New York
The former Deloitte UK CEO earned a 45% raise in a year when 1,000 staff reportedly lost their jobs – and the pay gap is only getting bigger
In a seminal development for big law, the 95-year-old firm is set to cease operations after a series of high-profile partner departures
UK Chancellor John Healey extended a VAT cut, suspended tariffs, increased a bank surcharge and vowed to increase funding for HMRC
Kristine Riisberg warned that TP decisions can determine top-up tax exposure under pillar two, while global consensus over the rules remains unsettled
Both Germany’s NIS2 and the EU AI Act now determine whether a tax function can meet its obligations – and both can make management personally accountable
Gift this article