Romania: Participation exemption regime applicable

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


Romania: Participation exemption regime applicable

parfenie.jpg

Arcadie Parfenie

There are many business driven arguments and motives to set up a holding company within a group. Ideally the holding company would not tax dividend income or capital gains, would not apply withholding tax on dividends payments, interest or royalty outflows or it would provide easy access to the EC Directives and/or strong network of double tax treaties, thereby eliminating or reducing withholding taxes on dividend, interest and royalty flows. Also, the location of the holding company should be sound in standing in the international business community, politically and economically stable, tried and tested as a holding company location. Although Romania was not included among these jurisdictions and it is difficult to pretend such status, it should be noted that a big step ahead was made recently in Romania. At the end of last year, a provision was enacted in the Romanian Fiscal Code which stipulates the exemption for capital gains realised from disposal of shares held either in Romanian entities or legal entities located in treaty countries and exemption of dividend income received from legal entities located in treaty countries. Typically, in most cases, primary holding company involves combining holding activity with financing and treasury activity, and/or IP activities. At this stage, there is no preferential tax treatment with respect to financing and IP holding activities in Romania, however, it should be considered that the new legislative provision would most likely boost the image and attractiveness of Romania as jurisdiction for establishing a holding company. Also, one can note that the requirements for exempting the capital gains are quite light compared with other jurisdictions well known as holding locations.

In particular, dividends received from foreign legal entities subject to corporate income tax or a similar tax, located in third countries with which Romania has concluded a double tax treaty and capital gains derived by Romanian legal entities from the sale of shares in Romanian legal entities or in legal entities from third countries with which Romania has concluded a double tax treaty are tax exempt in Romania under certain conditions. Basically, these provisions would apply if the taxpayer holds, for an uninterrupted period of at least one year, at least 10% of the share capital of (i) the legal entity paying the dividends or (ii) the legal entity in which the shares sold/assigned are held.

Separately, at this moment, Romania is one of few countries which still have an old type of double tax treaty with the US, that is without a limitation of benefits clause. Taking this into account, the treaty benefits may be secured in an easier manner for a reduction of withholding tax on interest payments from the US and further to the enactment of the new provision, for US exemption on capital gains for sale of shares, as well.

Arcadie Parfenie (arcadie.parfenie@ro.ey.com)

EY Romania

Tel: +4021 402 4000

Website: www.ey.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Awards
It was another banner year for Deloitte, which picked up more awards than any other firm at a gala ceremony held at The Londoner in Leicester Square
The big four firm has been embroiled in a scandal over partners’ misuse of confidential board papers to pitch for and win corporate audits for Westpac and Dexus
Drawing on lessons from the PepsiCo case, tax lawyer Paul McNab explains why the ATO's latest royalty guidance should concern multinationals well beyond the technology sector
As pillar two exposes the limits of fragmented tax processes, organisations are rethinking their operating models to create the trusted data foundations that AI demands
World Tax data shows Matt Donnelly is moving from a Tier 3 transactional tax practice to a Tier 1 market leader, underlining Kirkland & Ellis’s pull at the top end of the market
Nexdigm's Maulik Doshi and infer360 co-founder Sunil Agarwal dig deeper into their partnership and discuss why the tax technology industry is consolidating
Advisers won’t be short of work in a world of increased valuation disputes, documentation requirements and behavioural responses from clients seeking to protect their wealth
Jaydeep Menon explains how Frazier & Deeter built a specialist practice which helps UK start-ups expand into the US and why private equity backing is accelerating its ambitions
As joint audits, data sharing and pillar two reshape tax controversy, multinational groups can no longer afford to manage disputes one jurisdiction at a time
Brazil's tax system is being reshaped by VAT , pillar two and TP reform. Fallet explains why those changes convinced him to lead a new practice
Gift this article