Australia: Thin capitalisation and other international tax changes

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia: Thin capitalisation and other international tax changes

seymour.jpg

Tom Seymour

As previously reported, the government has announced its position in relation to a range of international tax measures that had been announced by the previous government but not yet legislated. This includes the proposal to tighten the thin capitalisation regime with effect from income years commencing on or after July 1 2014, and includes changes to:

  • Reduce the safe harbour debt limit for general entities from 3:1 to 1.5:1 on a debt to equity basis;

  • Reduce the safe harbour debt limit for non-bank financial entities from 20:1 to 15:1 on a debt to equity basis;

  • Increase the safe harbour minimum capital for banks from 4% to 6% of the risk weighted assets of their Australian operations;

  • Reduce the worldwide gearing ratio from 120% to 100% and making it available to inbound investors; and

  • Increase the de minimis threshold from $250,000 to $2 million of debt deductions.

The alternative arm's-length debt test will remain available, subject to review.

It is unlikely that there will be any transitional provisions or grandfathering for existing funding arrangements.

Taxpayers should note that capitalising debt arrangements to fall within the safe harbour debt limit may have other tax implications. For example, foreign exchange realisation, changes in the rate of tax loss utilisation for tax consolidated groups and commercial debt forgiveness.

In addition to tightening the thin capitalisation regime, the government has made the following announcements:

  • The government will not abolish the provision that enables Australian companies to claim a deduction for interest incurred in earning exempt non-portfolio dividends. Instead, it will introduce a new targeted anti-avoidance provision.

  • Changes will be made to the non-portfolio dividend exemption so that it only applies to instruments that are equity in substance.

  • The non-resident capital gains tax (CGT) provisions will be amended which may result in certain shares held by non-residents now falling within the Australian tax net (applicable to CGT events occurring after May 14 2013).

  • A non-final non-resident withholding tax regime will be introduced (from July 1 2016) under which purchasers will be required to withhold and remit to the Australian Taxation Office 10% of the purchase price of certain taxable Australian property acquired from non-resident vendors.

  • Disappointingly, the government will not proceed with the modernisation of the controlled foreign company provisions.

Tom Seymour (tom.seymour@au.pwc.com)

PwC Australia

Tel: +61 (7) 3257 8623

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Magnus Pantzar is set to join as managing director after spending nearly a decade as EQT’s global head of tax
The OECD’s project was up for debate as Matt Williams spoke to ITR following BDO’s tax strategist survey, which uncovered increased complexity and costs among multinationals
Sponsored by Deloitte
Sameer Nurmohamed, partner, Deloitte Legal Canada
Sponsored by Deloitte
George Ankomah, partner, Tax & Regulatory Services, Deloitte Africa (Ghana)
The recent spree of firm mergers and acquisitions proves that geographic scale is the name of the game
The big four spin-off firm becomes Taxand’s second UK member; in other news, Haynes Boone launched a UK tax practice
Sponsored by Deloitte Luxembourg
Jean-Michel Henry and Mona El-Begawi of Deloitte Luxembourg examine the complexities created by timing differences in Luxembourg, EU, and OECD tax regimes
Stephanie Pantelidaki’s economic expertise will give Norton Rose Fulbright’s other teams ‘extra firepower,’ she says
Sponsored by MFA Legal & Tech
Samuel Fernandes de Almeida of MFA Legal & Tech assesses whether Portugal’s 7.5% surcharge on non-residents aligns with the EU’s free movement of capital principle and passes the proportionality test
Sponsored by McCarthy Tétrault
Senior McCarthy Tétrault tax practitioners highlight significant updates and implications for multinationals as Canada’s transfer pricing rules become more closely aligned with OECD guidance
Gift this article