Australia: Thin capitalisation and other international tax changes

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia: Thin capitalisation and other international tax changes

seymour.jpg

Tom Seymour

As previously reported, the government has announced its position in relation to a range of international tax measures that had been announced by the previous government but not yet legislated. This includes the proposal to tighten the thin capitalisation regime with effect from income years commencing on or after July 1 2014, and includes changes to:

  • Reduce the safe harbour debt limit for general entities from 3:1 to 1.5:1 on a debt to equity basis;

  • Reduce the safe harbour debt limit for non-bank financial entities from 20:1 to 15:1 on a debt to equity basis;

  • Increase the safe harbour minimum capital for banks from 4% to 6% of the risk weighted assets of their Australian operations;

  • Reduce the worldwide gearing ratio from 120% to 100% and making it available to inbound investors; and

  • Increase the de minimis threshold from $250,000 to $2 million of debt deductions.

The alternative arm's-length debt test will remain available, subject to review.

It is unlikely that there will be any transitional provisions or grandfathering for existing funding arrangements.

Taxpayers should note that capitalising debt arrangements to fall within the safe harbour debt limit may have other tax implications. For example, foreign exchange realisation, changes in the rate of tax loss utilisation for tax consolidated groups and commercial debt forgiveness.

In addition to tightening the thin capitalisation regime, the government has made the following announcements:

  • The government will not abolish the provision that enables Australian companies to claim a deduction for interest incurred in earning exempt non-portfolio dividends. Instead, it will introduce a new targeted anti-avoidance provision.

  • Changes will be made to the non-portfolio dividend exemption so that it only applies to instruments that are equity in substance.

  • The non-resident capital gains tax (CGT) provisions will be amended which may result in certain shares held by non-residents now falling within the Australian tax net (applicable to CGT events occurring after May 14 2013).

  • A non-final non-resident withholding tax regime will be introduced (from July 1 2016) under which purchasers will be required to withhold and remit to the Australian Taxation Office 10% of the purchase price of certain taxable Australian property acquired from non-resident vendors.

  • Disappointingly, the government will not proceed with the modernisation of the controlled foreign company provisions.

Tom Seymour (tom.seymour@au.pwc.com)

PwC Australia

Tel: +61 (7) 3257 8623

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Police may be inside the Sydney office for ‘several days’, PwC Australia’s chief executive officer said
The source of additional remuneration received by PwC Australia CEO Kevin Burrowes had been the subject of much parliamentary scrutiny
The Independent Schools Council is bringing litigation against the UK government for what it calls an ‘unprecedented education tax’
But the firm said that ‘difficult market conditions’ led to a slowdown in Asia Pacific; in other news, OECD begins Thailand accession process
The move will provide certainty to taxpayers and reduce the risk associated with pricing transactions for TP, according to India’s Ministry of Finance
Pia Honkala, co-head of Aibidia’s operational TP product, tells ITR how her company works in harmony with advisers like the ‘big four’ to revolutionise clients’ processes
The UK is ‘heading to Scandinavia’ as its tax burden increases and isn’t creating an attractive environment for a wave of investment, experts have told ITR
Japan, South Korea and Germany increased their R&D tax budgets at a much greater rate over a 14-year period, say RCK Partners and the London Business School
Under the proposed directive, multinationals with numerous EU presences would have to make only one filing to comply with pillar two
Robert Venables of Old Street Tax Chambers had previously brought multiple cases against HMRC on behalf of clients
Gift this article