Germany: Treaty override under constitutional attack again

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Treaty override under constitutional attack again

petra.jpg

muscheites.jpg

Petra Peitz-Ziemann


Erik Muscheites

The treaty override provisions of the Income Tax Act make an exemption of, among others, employment income conditional on full taxation or conscious waiver of taxation in the other state. However, exemption from taxation in the other state by reason of non-resident status there or qualification conflict on the type of income is not a conscious waiver. This latter tightening in the law was introduced in 2013 but with retroactive effect as it was a mere "clarification" of a previously "unclear" legal provision. However, the Supreme Tax Court had already ruled – before this clarification – that the treaty override was, unless specifically provided for in the treaty, in breach of the treaty and therefore of international law. As such it was unconstitutional. That case concerned a German resident pilot of an Irish airline whose salary was exempt in Germany under the aircrew provision of the treaty and exempt in Ireland in the hands of a non-resident (Irish law has since been changed for non-resident aircrew). The court laid the question before the Constitutional Court, which has not yet responded. The Supreme Tax Court has now heard a further case on the same issue, brought, again, by a German resident pilot of an Irish airline. On October 15, it published its resolution to lay again the same question before the Constitutional Court. This time, though, it now has occasion to call the retroactive application of the 2013 clarification into constitutional question. It sees the change as a change in substance to the disadvantage of taxpayers affected. As such, it cannot be applied retroactively.

As further cases on the constitutional position of unilateral treaty override clauses are pending, we recommend those affected to appeal against their tax assessment notices. If nothing else, this will serve to keep their positions open until the Constitutional Court has handed down a ruling.

Petra Peitz-Ziemann (petra.peitz-ziemann@de.pwc.com) and Erik Muscheites (erik.muscheites@de.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +49 69 9585 6586 and +49 69 9585 3628

Website: www.pwc.de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The levies extended beyond the president’s ‘legitimate reach’, the Supreme Court ruled
While Brazil’s consumption tax overhaul led to a short-term spike in tax advisory demand, we are now in a period of ‘normalisation’ marked by decreased recruitment
The expanded firm will comprise roughly 8,500 employees, including 550 partners; in other news, Paul Hastings and Macfarlanes made senior tax hires
Meanwhile, one expert highlights the importance of separating Venezuela’s tax authority from direct political control after ‘lost decades and isolation’
With PMK 108, Indonesia has upgraded its tax transparency regime for the digital era, focusing on data quality, governance, and cross border exchange rather than expanding regulatory reach
In a popular LinkedIn post, Jeremie Beitel encouraged firms to invest in junior talent even if it doesn’t lead to their loyalty, though recruiters offered ITR a mixed assessment
Advisers who do not register for the new regime in time could be prevented from interacting with HMRC, the tax authority said
Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
Gift this article