Germany: Treaty override under constitutional attack again

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Treaty override under constitutional attack again

petra.jpg

muscheites.jpg

Petra Peitz-Ziemann


Erik Muscheites

The treaty override provisions of the Income Tax Act make an exemption of, among others, employment income conditional on full taxation or conscious waiver of taxation in the other state. However, exemption from taxation in the other state by reason of non-resident status there or qualification conflict on the type of income is not a conscious waiver. This latter tightening in the law was introduced in 2013 but with retroactive effect as it was a mere "clarification" of a previously "unclear" legal provision. However, the Supreme Tax Court had already ruled – before this clarification – that the treaty override was, unless specifically provided for in the treaty, in breach of the treaty and therefore of international law. As such it was unconstitutional. That case concerned a German resident pilot of an Irish airline whose salary was exempt in Germany under the aircrew provision of the treaty and exempt in Ireland in the hands of a non-resident (Irish law has since been changed for non-resident aircrew). The court laid the question before the Constitutional Court, which has not yet responded. The Supreme Tax Court has now heard a further case on the same issue, brought, again, by a German resident pilot of an Irish airline. On October 15, it published its resolution to lay again the same question before the Constitutional Court. This time, though, it now has occasion to call the retroactive application of the 2013 clarification into constitutional question. It sees the change as a change in substance to the disadvantage of taxpayers affected. As such, it cannot be applied retroactively.

As further cases on the constitutional position of unilateral treaty override clauses are pending, we recommend those affected to appeal against their tax assessment notices. If nothing else, this will serve to keep their positions open until the Constitutional Court has handed down a ruling.

Petra Peitz-Ziemann (petra.peitz-ziemann@de.pwc.com) and Erik Muscheites (erik.muscheites@de.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +49 69 9585 6586 and +49 69 9585 3628

Website: www.pwc.de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2026 showed why harmonisation remains elusive, advisers must raise their game, and ‘everyone’s data is rubbish’
The firm’s board has reportedly asked Kevin Burrowes to continue until 2028 as the KPMG Australia scandal raises expectations of regulatory reform
A former Deloitte partner will lead the firm’s latest geographic expansion; in other news, Baker McKenzie added six tax lawyers to its partnership
The Fair Tax Mark now extends to domestic-only companies with turnover above €1m, with Thai travel operator Tripseed the first to be certified
A technology provider had to be educated on technical requirements by Joseph Ribkoff’s IT team, a tax manager at the company said
But businesses should remain flexible when choosing between internal and external resources to handle added ViDA complexity, ITR’s Indirect Tax forum also heard
Non-compliance from small businesses continues to account for most of the gap, HM Revenue and Customs revealed
The new managing director of R&D tax relief consultancy ForrestBrown tells ITR about his priorities for the business, where he’s focusing his time and what makes tax cool
PwC Australia’s response to its tax leaks scandal could give KPMG a useful case study, but so far there’s little sign of positive lessons learned
Tom Goldstein’s attempt to overturn his tax conviction was shot down; in other news, Deloitte promoted several tax partners in Italy
Gift this article