Brazil: Brazilian revenue authorities release provision for treating certain Swiss regimes as privileged tax regimes

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Brazilian revenue authorities release provision for treating certain Swiss regimes as privileged tax regimes

jeffrey.jpg

carmona.jpg

Philippe Jeffrey


Gustavo Carmona

On June 20 2014, the Brazilian federal Revenue authorities issued Normative Instruction No 1,474/2014 (NI 1,474), providing that certain Swiss tax regimes should be considered 'privileged tax regimes' for Brazilian tax purposes. Further, it removes the Hungarian offshore low-tax company (KFT) regime from its list of privileged tax regimes. NI 1,474 is applicable from January 1 2014. When Brazilian taxpayers deal with parties subject to a privileged tax regime, some important considerations include the application of more restrictive transfer pricing rules that must be applied regardless of whether the foreign party is related to the Brazilian entity, as well as more restrictive thin capitalisation rules.

NI 1,474 amends Normative Instruction No. 1,037/2010 (NI 1,037) which set out a list of tax havens and privileged tax regimes for Brazilian tax purposes. Specifically, in relation to Switzerland, NI 1,474 provides that the following regimes should be considered as privileged tax regimes:

  • Regimes applicable to a Swiss entity incorporated as a holding company, domiciliary company, auxiliary company, mixed company and/or administrative company whose tax treatment results in a corporate income tax rate of lower than 20% (on a combined basis) under federal, cantonal and municipal legislation; and

  • Regimes applicable to other entities whose tax treatment, as a result of the application of rulings issued by local tax authorities, results in a corporate income tax rate of lower than 20% (on a combined basis), under federal, cantonal and municipal legislation.

Switzerland was originally considered a tax haven jurisdiction for Brazilian tax purposes on the black-list detailed in NI 1,037. Its inclusion in the black-list was then suspended and, as a result of NI 1,474 has now been cancelled. Therefore, while Switzerland may not be considered a tax haven jurisdiction, it is still necessary to consider whether the particular regime applicable to the Swiss entity falls within the definition of privileged tax regime.

Modification to the Brazilian tax on financial operations (IOF)

On June 4 2014, Decree nº 8,263 was published, reducing the minimum average term for foreign loans subject to the tax on financial operations (IOF) at 6% from 360 days to 180 days. Under the new rule, the 0% IOF rate is now applicable to foreign loans contracted as of June 4 2014 with minimum average term of greater than 180 days.

Following the Brazilian government increasing the IOF rate levied for foreign loan transactions in March 2011 from 5.38% to 6% and raising the minimum average term from 90 days to 360 days, the authorities have used the tax as a means of controlling speculative short-term investments in Brazil (the minimum average term to apply the 0% rate going as high as 1800 days in early 2012). The new rules are intended to encourage Brazilian companies to obtain loans from abroad and to mitigate the effects of foreign exchange swings between the Brazilian Real and the US Dollar.

It is important to note that where IOF applies to the foreign loan, the 6% rate will apply to the full loan principal when the funds enter Brazil and are exchanged into Brazilian Reais. Further, foreign loans with an initial term of more than 180 days will still be subject to the 6% IOF rate where the loan is repaid within the 180 day period.

Philippe Jeffrey (philippe.jeffrey@br.pwc.com) and Gustavo Carmona (gustavo.carmona@br.pwc.com)

PwC

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In-house teams who want a balance of internal control and external expertise for pillar two should seriously consider co-sourcing models, Russell Gammon of Tax Systems argues
The OECD has vowed to continue working with the US despite the president effectively pulling the country out of the organisation’s global minimum tax deal
Norton Rose Fulbright highlights a Brazilian investment fund as a practical example of how new Dutch tax rules will require significant attention from foreign companies
Thomson Reuters now has ‘end-to-end capability’ for its tax workflow business, according to its president for tax accounting and audit professionals
Patrick O’Gara, who is rated as a ‘highly regarded practitioner’ by World Tax, had spent over 20 years at Baker McKenzie
If approved, it would become the first ‘big four’ firm to practise law in the US; in other news, Morrison Foerster hired a new global tax co-chair
The ‘birth date’ of the service, which will collect tariffs, duties and other foreign revenue, will be January 20
Awards
Submit your nominations to this year's WIBL Americas Awards by February 28
Awards
Research for the annual Women in Business Law Awards has begun – submit your entries by February 28
In-house counsel across a number of regions are unimpressed with their tax advisers’ CSR efforts, according to ITR+ research
Gift this article