Chile: Main tax novelties introduced by the Chilean sole law on funds

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile: Main tax novelties introduced by the Chilean sole law on funds

campos.jpg

seisdedos.jpg

German Campos


Alba Seisdedos

On January 7 2014, Law No. 20,712, on Management of Third Party Funds and Individual Portfolio and which repeals pieces of legislation as indicated (Sole Law on Funds or LUF, as per its acronym in Spanish), was published in the Chilean Official Gazette. This law creates a sole piece of legislation applicable to the industry of third party funds management (investment funds (FIs), mutual funds (FMs), private investment funds (FIPs) and venture capital, mainly) and aligns the tax treatment of investment funds established in Chile and abroad. This to attract foreign investors to the Chilean capital market as well as turning Chile into a regional investment platform.

Accordingly, it is clear that major tax benefits incorporated by the LUF are designed for non-domiciled/residents investors, without truly relevant novelties in tax field been set forth for local investors.

Before the approval of the LUF, it was demanded for foreign investors the creation of a special fund to perform investments in local funds (FICE/FICER); as per LUF's provisions, foreigners can now invest directly in the same funds that locals do – reducing cost and injecting more liquidity.

Even though the LUF preserves the quality of non-taxpayers for the funds, it incorporates significant developments in tax matters.

As a main tax novelty, tax treatment applicable to foreign investors should be emphasised. Now, foreign investors investing both in FI or FM, will be subject upon the amounts distributed by the fund, as well as for the increased value obtained in the disposal or redemption of quotas, to a sole income tax of 10% without right to credit.

Moreover, they could be even released from said taxation to the extent that certain requirements would be met – basically, that the fund maintains for a specific period 80% or more of its assets exclusively assigned to overseas investments.

Regarding fund administrators, LUF's provisions envisaged for them general obligations of tax compliance and information to be filed before the tax authorities on behalf of the non-domiciled or non-resident investors. Additionally, remunerations received by the fund administrator for the part corresponding to quotas owned by foreign investors are exempt from VAT. These initiatives seek, respectively, increasing the efficiency of the investment industry, as well as enhancing the export of financial services; treating them in a similar way as service exportation.

Tax novelties are also introduced in connection with FIPs; essentially, limits to ensure the independence between the capital owners to prevent the utilisation of FIPs as vehicles for tax avoidance. In case said limits will not be complied with – provided it fails to settle this situation – FIP will be considered for all purposes (tax and legal) as a stock corporation.

Overall, it appears that these initiatives, jointly with the legal and economic stability that characterises Chile within the region, will capture the attention of foreign investors.

However, we may stay alert to possible substantive changes in the regulation of this industry that can be incorporated during the mandate of the new government led by Michelle Bachelet, since to date, first news related to its taxation's programme (that primarily advocates a tax increase for companies and stricter policies regarding investment funds' industry), seem to be entirely opposite to the spirit of the LUF's wording.

German Campos (german.campos@cl.pwc.com) and Alba Seisdedos (alba.seisdedos@cl.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: (+56 2) 2940 0098

Website: www.pwc.com/cl

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s most interesting stories of the year covered ‘landmark’ legal battles, pillar two, AI’s relationship with transfer pricing and more
Chinwe Odimba-Chapman was announced as Michael Bates’ successor; in other news, a report has found a high level of BEPS compliance among OECD jurisdictions
The tool, which will automatically compute amount B returns, requires “only minimal data inputs”, according to the OECD
The rules are intended to implement the substance of an earlier OECD report in its entirety
While new technology won’t replace the human touch, it could help relieve companies’ staffing issues, EY’s David Helmer and Daren Campbell tell ITR
The firm said the financial growth came from increased demand for its AI services and global tax reform advice
Chrystia Freeland had also been the figurehead of Canada’s controversial digital services tax adoption, which stoked economic tensions with the US
Panama has no official position on pillar two so far and a move to implement in Costa Rica will face rejection, experts tell ITR
The KPMG partner tells ITR about Sri Lanka’s complex and evolving tax landscape, setting legal precedents through client work, and his vision for the future of tax
Overall turnover at the firm also reached a record £8 billion; in other news, Ashurst and Dentons announced senior tax partner hires
Gift this article