Mexico: New tax position on pro-rata expenses assigned to Mexico

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico: New tax position on pro-rata expenses assigned to Mexico

cuellar.jpg

nava.jpg

David Cuellar


Marco Nava

According to the Mexican income tax law (MITL), expenses incurred abroad by a non-resident which are assigned to a Mexican entity on a pro-rata basis are not deductible for income tax purposes in any case. Based on the MITL, a tax deduction of pro-rata expenses is only available for Mexican branches or permanent establishments registered in Mexico to the extent that certain requirements are met. Nevertheless, recently the Mexican Nation Justice's Supreme Court issued a favourable resolution to a private case in which it expressed its position about the prohibition for Mexican entities to deduct pro-rated expenses incurred outside Mexico. In this regard, the Mexican Supreme Court concluded that the limitation for Mexican entities to deduct pro-rata expenses for income tax purposes has not to be deemed in terms of strict application and rather that the tax authorities, before disallowing a tax deduction, must verify if other requirements are satisfied.

The resolution states that there should be a reasonable relationship between the expense and the benefit obtained locally in such manner that the expense does not exceed the benefit obtained by the Mexican taxpayer. In this regard, Mexican tax authorities should validate if the following main requirements are met:

  • The expense must be strictly indispensable to the carrying out of business in Mexico.

  • There must be a reasonable relationship between the expense incurred and the benefit obtained in Mexico.

  • If the expense was incurred between related parties the consideration has to be determined at fair market value under Mexican transfer pricing rules.

  • Taxpayers must be able to demonstrate with documentation the details of the transaction such as type of operation, contractual terms, transfer pricing methodology adopted and comparable data used for such purpose.

  • The expense must be in compliance with Mexican tax laws, accounting principles and the expense must be incurred for a valid business reason and not in an abusive manner.

The Mexican Nation Justice's Supreme Court issued this resolution to protect the constitutional rights in favour of a Mexican taxpayer in the sense that the Mexican tax authorities have to verify if the pro-rata expense complied with such requirements before assessing a tax liability.

In this regard, expenses assigned on a pro-rata basis to a Mexican entity may be deductible to the extent that they comply with the requirements set forth in the domestic law and the criteria stated in the resolution mentioned before. Nevertheless, it is important to consider that the Mexican tax authorities may take a subjective position to some of the concepts included in the Supreme Court's precedent in order to disallow the deduction of pro-rata expenses, since the resolution is not conforming to jurisprudence.

David Cuellar (david.cuellar@mx.pwc.com) and Marco Nava (marco.a.nava@us.pwc.com), Mexico City

PwC

Tel: +52 55 5263 5816

Fax: +52 55 5263 6010

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s most interesting stories of the year covered ‘landmark’ legal battles, pillar two, AI’s relationship with transfer pricing and more
Chinwe Odimba-Chapman was announced as Michael Bates’ successor; in other news, a report has found a high level of BEPS compliance among OECD jurisdictions
The tool, which will automatically compute amount B returns, requires “only minimal data inputs”, according to the OECD
The rules are intended to implement the substance of an earlier OECD report in its entirety
While new technology won’t replace the human touch, it could help relieve companies’ staffing issues, EY’s David Helmer and Daren Campbell tell ITR
The firm said the financial growth came from increased demand for its AI services and global tax reform advice
Chrystia Freeland had also been the figurehead of Canada’s controversial digital services tax adoption, which stoked economic tensions with the US
Panama has no official position on pillar two so far and a move to implement in Costa Rica will face rejection, experts tell ITR
The KPMG partner tells ITR about Sri Lanka’s complex and evolving tax landscape, setting legal precedents through client work, and his vision for the future of tax
Overall turnover at the firm also reached a record £8 billion; in other news, Ashurst and Dentons announced senior tax partner hires
Gift this article