FREE: How the new UK-Hungary DTA will improve certainty

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

FREE: How the new UK-Hungary DTA will improve certainty

The UK and Hungary have signed a comprehensive agreement for the avoidance of double taxation that will provide increased cross-border certainty between the two countries.

The treaty was signed on Wednesday 7 September and will enter into force once both countries have finalised the necessary parliamentary procedures.

A previous treaty had been signed in 1977.

The treaty covers taxes on income and on capital gains imposed on behalf of a contracting state, as well as providing clarification over issues of residency and permanent establishment.

Greg Dorey, British ambassador to Hungary, said the agreement will increase confidence in cross-border trade.

“Since bilateral trade has reached record levels and the citizens of our two countries increasingly contribute to both of our economies, this is good news.”

“It also helps contribute towards a stable business environment which can foster foreign investment. And it protects governments’ taxing rights and against attempts to avoid or evade tax liability,” he added. “So this is an important step in making sure that our citizens pay their fair share towards the costs of our governments and the important services they provide.”

The treaty comes at a time when the UK government has been seeking stakeholder comment on legislation that was intended to combat tax avoidance schemes which exploit DTA provisions. Last week the Treasury announced it is cancelling that consultation. The cancellation is welcome, said one adviser.

“The cancellation of the consultation on double tax treaties, launched in summer, and confirmation that the government will adopt a more targeted approach in future, will be greeted with a sigh of relief,” said Chris Sanger, head of global tax policy at Ernst & Young. “Had the government’s proposals gone ahead, UK competitiveness would have been eroded. It would have hit commercial transactions by restricting access to funding markets and hiked up costs of investing into the UK.”

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

A global tax framework may not materialise anytime soon, but a common set of principles is becoming increasingly necessary, Rudolf Winkenius also tells ITR
Kingsley Napley’s claimants are arguing that taxing the provision of education breaches the European Convention on Human Rights
While pillar two can progress without the US, it won’t reach the same heights without American involvement, argues Renáta Bláhová, founding partner of BMB Partners Taxand
There are unanswered questions as to how foreign investors could reclaim money via tax credits, advisers suggested
Amid an ever-changing tax environment, India’s advisory market is bustling with competition ahead of the 2025 World Tax rankings and ITR Awards
The deal comes after PwC had accused Paul McNab of using confidential information; in other news, McDermott hired a new London tax head from a US rival
Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Cultural nuances could account for tax advisers’ perceived poor cost management, a local partner told ITR
Gift this article