Mexico: New criteria to withhold VAT to foreign residents

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico: New criteria to withhold VAT to foreign residents

cuellar.jpg

nava.jpg

David Cuellar


Marco Nava

On May 31 2013 the Mexican tax authorities issued non-binding criteria on the application of the value added tax (VAT) law regarding VAT withholding to foreign residents, when certain transactions are carried out with Mexican taxpayers. According to the Mexican VAT Law, Mexican taxpayers are obliged to withhold and remit 16% VAT on the acquisition or leasing of tangible goods that are sold or granted by a foreign resident without a permanent establishment (PE) in Mexico. With this mechanism, Mexican taxpayers withhold the corresponding VAT and, if certain conditions are met, they can credit such VAT.

Additionally, the Mexican VAT law establishes that a foreign resident would be deemed as resident in Mexican territory for VAT purposes when it has one or more establishments (which may be intrepreted as not necessarily permanent, but just an establishment) for all the activities carried out therein. Consequently, there was an interpretation which suggested that some foreigners may be tax residents in Mexico for VAT purposes but not for income tax purposes and therefore the 16% withholding VAT resulted not applicable, without taking into consideration whether they have a PE in Mexico, or not.

In this regard, the Mexican tax authorities issued new criteria establishing that when a foreign resident without a PE in Mexico carries out activities regarding the acquisition or leasing of tangible goods in Mexico, the PE definition in the income tax law or in the tax treaties concluded by Mexico should be applicable; and it should be deemed as a non-binding criteria when a foreign resident with no PE in Mexico carries out these types of activities and the Mexican taxpayer does not withhold VAT, considering that the foreign resident is resident in Mexico for VAT purposes.

If an annual statutory tax report needs to be filed to the Mexican tax authorities by the auditor of a Mexican taxpayer, the auditor should disclose whether non-binding criteria were applied by the taxpayer, so these transactions should be reviewed in detail during the audit process.

It is recommended that foreign residents carefully structure their operations when leasing or selling tangible goods to Mexican residents on a case-by-case basis, and determine the corresponding tax consequences that may arise in Mexico both for income tax and VAT purposes.

David Cuellar (david.cuellar@mx.pwc.com) and Marco Nava (marco.a.nava@us.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +52 55 5263 5816

Fax: +52 55 5263 6010

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Moore, founding partner of the Chicago tax boutique which bears her name, shares her career wisdom for ITR’s new Women in Tax interview series
But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
Gift this article