Mexico: New criteria to withhold VAT to foreign residents

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico: New criteria to withhold VAT to foreign residents

cuellar.jpg

nava.jpg

David Cuellar


Marco Nava

On May 31 2013 the Mexican tax authorities issued non-binding criteria on the application of the value added tax (VAT) law regarding VAT withholding to foreign residents, when certain transactions are carried out with Mexican taxpayers. According to the Mexican VAT Law, Mexican taxpayers are obliged to withhold and remit 16% VAT on the acquisition or leasing of tangible goods that are sold or granted by a foreign resident without a permanent establishment (PE) in Mexico. With this mechanism, Mexican taxpayers withhold the corresponding VAT and, if certain conditions are met, they can credit such VAT.

Additionally, the Mexican VAT law establishes that a foreign resident would be deemed as resident in Mexican territory for VAT purposes when it has one or more establishments (which may be intrepreted as not necessarily permanent, but just an establishment) for all the activities carried out therein. Consequently, there was an interpretation which suggested that some foreigners may be tax residents in Mexico for VAT purposes but not for income tax purposes and therefore the 16% withholding VAT resulted not applicable, without taking into consideration whether they have a PE in Mexico, or not.

In this regard, the Mexican tax authorities issued new criteria establishing that when a foreign resident without a PE in Mexico carries out activities regarding the acquisition or leasing of tangible goods in Mexico, the PE definition in the income tax law or in the tax treaties concluded by Mexico should be applicable; and it should be deemed as a non-binding criteria when a foreign resident with no PE in Mexico carries out these types of activities and the Mexican taxpayer does not withhold VAT, considering that the foreign resident is resident in Mexico for VAT purposes.

If an annual statutory tax report needs to be filed to the Mexican tax authorities by the auditor of a Mexican taxpayer, the auditor should disclose whether non-binding criteria were applied by the taxpayer, so these transactions should be reviewed in detail during the audit process.

It is recommended that foreign residents carefully structure their operations when leasing or selling tangible goods to Mexican residents on a case-by-case basis, and determine the corresponding tax consequences that may arise in Mexico both for income tax and VAT purposes.

David Cuellar (david.cuellar@mx.pwc.com) and Marco Nava (marco.a.nava@us.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +52 55 5263 5816

Fax: +52 55 5263 6010

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The long-running dispute centres on Medtronic’s use of the comparable uncontrolled transaction TP method; in other news, Paul Hastings and FTI Consulting both made double tax hires
The boutique Australian firm’s TP award recognition proves that world-class advisory services aren’t limited to the ‘big four’, the firm’s founder tells ITR
Canadian and Indian dual VAT models have been a source of inspiration for the Brazilian model, but the latter has unique and innovative features, the OECD paper claimed
More sophisticated use of technology, heightened TP scrutiny and stricter filing requirements are making South African Revenue Service audits a formidable challenge
The hire of Doug Wick expands Baker McKenzie’s state and local tax practice and adds to the firm’s growing ex-IRS expertise
One year after Nuwaru joined the WTS network, leaders James Jobson and Matthew Missaghi reflect on the firm’s mission to offer mid-tier pricing but deliver top-tier results
Join ITR's Head of Research, John Harrison, for an overview of key dates, new developments, best practices, and more for next year’s research cycle
The president’s tariff regime has already caused misery for taxpayers. Losing at the Supreme Court would mean it was all for nothing
The US itself was the biggest loser of tax revenue to American multinationals’ profit shifting, the Tax Justice Network reported; in other news, firms made key tax hires
Identifying who will bear the costs and concerns around confidentiality are issues yet to be resolved, advisers say
Gift this article