Switzerland: Switzerland’s proposed Corporate Tax Reform III – transfer pricing impacts

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Switzerland’s proposed Corporate Tax Reform III – transfer pricing impacts

habermacher.jpg

klein.jpg

Hans Rudolf Habermacher


Anja Klein

The proposed abolishment of the Swiss holding, mixed and domiciliary company tax regimes within the next five to seven years and the planned introduction of replacement tax measures (for example, the licence box and notional interest deduction) known as the "Swiss Corporate Tax Reform III" has recently sparked some discussions regarding its impact on corporate taxation. It should not be forgotten, though, that this reform will also have significant impacts on transfer pricing arrangements: many MNEs conducting business in Switzerland operate under said tax regimes and from a transfer pricing perspective their abolishment may entail a revision of the underlying business model and transfer pricing set-up to ensure MNEs continue to benefit from favourable taxation levels in Switzerland. The proposed tax reform may require taxpayers to pay more attention to their transfer pricing arrangements. This, however, may provide valid opportunities for companies to optimise their intercompany structures in such a way that they make maximum use of the new structuring possibilities. If implemented, an IP box tax exemption may allow existing companies to significantly reduce the tax rate on royalty income received from foreign affiliated companies or alternatively, a separate licence box company could be created to benefit from such an exemption.

Similarly, the notional interest deduction on equity as currently suggested would be an effective way to reduce a holding company's or mixed company's taxable income in case of a strong equity base. Thus, the new tax reform will allow taxpayers to implement attractive structures through valid transfer pricing, if aligned to the transfer pricing guidelines, as alternatives to the existing preferential Swiss tax regimes.

Hans Rudolf Habermacher (hhabermacher@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 6327
Anja Klein (aklein@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 7245

Deloitte

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

HMRC expects advisers to meet ever-higher compliance criteria. After 24 consecutive qualified audit opinions, many will ask whether HMRC should hold itself to the same standards
The purchase of Marosa represents the second major tax tech consolidation this week, raising questions of a broader industry trend
Peru’s approach to TP is increasingly at odds with OECD-style profitability policies, exposing multinational groups to asymmetric tax adjustments
Hany Elnaggar examines how the region's legacy economic substance regimes and the OECD's pillar two framework are converging on the same underlying test
The deals for TP Accurate and Intra Pricing Solutions will enhance Alphatax’s ability to support clients with the full TP lifecycle, the tax tech provider claimed
The DS Advocates partner discusses career reinvention, tax disputes and why advisory and litigation experience should complement one another
Lindsay Clayton’s arrival at Baker McKenzie continues the firm’s storied pursuit of ex-US government lawyers, a strategy reinforced by robust World Tax rankings
Shared transaction semantics, governed data and reusable ERP design may prove the most significant benefits of the UK's move to Peppol
As pillar two reshapes global tax competition, the UK faces a crucial challenge: how to remain attractive to multinationals without sacrificing tax revenues
Pillar two may be raising less than expected, but professor René Matteotti says the regime is still changing multinational tax behaviour
Gift this article