Switzerland: Switzerland’s proposed Corporate Tax Reform III – transfer pricing impacts

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


Switzerland: Switzerland’s proposed Corporate Tax Reform III – transfer pricing impacts

habermacher.jpg

klein.jpg

Hans Rudolf Habermacher


Anja Klein

The proposed abolishment of the Swiss holding, mixed and domiciliary company tax regimes within the next five to seven years and the planned introduction of replacement tax measures (for example, the licence box and notional interest deduction) known as the "Swiss Corporate Tax Reform III" has recently sparked some discussions regarding its impact on corporate taxation. It should not be forgotten, though, that this reform will also have significant impacts on transfer pricing arrangements: many MNEs conducting business in Switzerland operate under said tax regimes and from a transfer pricing perspective their abolishment may entail a revision of the underlying business model and transfer pricing set-up to ensure MNEs continue to benefit from favourable taxation levels in Switzerland. The proposed tax reform may require taxpayers to pay more attention to their transfer pricing arrangements. This, however, may provide valid opportunities for companies to optimise their intercompany structures in such a way that they make maximum use of the new structuring possibilities. If implemented, an IP box tax exemption may allow existing companies to significantly reduce the tax rate on royalty income received from foreign affiliated companies or alternatively, a separate licence box company could be created to benefit from such an exemption.

Similarly, the notional interest deduction on equity as currently suggested would be an effective way to reduce a holding company's or mixed company's taxable income in case of a strong equity base. Thus, the new tax reform will allow taxpayers to implement attractive structures through valid transfer pricing, if aligned to the transfer pricing guidelines, as alternatives to the existing preferential Swiss tax regimes.

Hans Rudolf Habermacher (hhabermacher@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 6327
Anja Klein (aklein@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 7245

Deloitte

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

UK Chancellor John Healey extended a VAT cut, suspended tariffs, increased a bank surcharge and vowed to increase funding for HMRC
Kristine Riisberg warned that TP decisions can determine top-up tax exposure under pillar two, while global consensus over the rules remains unsettled
Both Germany’s NIS2 and the EU AI Act now determine whether a tax function can meet its obligations – and both can make management personally accountable
Originators, loan purchasers and securitisation vehicles may need to revisit servicing agreements and pricing after a key judgment narrowed the VAT credit management exemption
Opening doors for existing talent within Baker McKenzie and a desire for enhanced legal capabilities informed Ricardo Perera’s switch from KPMG
Boaz Goren’s move to the upstart PE-backed firm takes the number of senior UK tax professionals who have left EY this year to 13
The allegations against Deloitte Cyprus raise uncomfortable questions about how far the big four can distance themselves from misconduct at member firms
The UAE accounted for most Middle East promotions and new rankings, as A&M Tax, Baker McKenzie, Dhruva Consultants and DLA Piper breached the top tier
Spanish-headquartered multinationals lead on reporting quality, while US and Swiss groups lag in the Fair Tax Foundation’s expanded analysis
Former IRS commissioner Danny Werfel joins ITR for a must-listen conversation spanning his time leading the agency, his AI risk framework, and the future of the OECD
Gift this article