Switzerland: Switzerland’s proposed Corporate Tax Reform III – transfer pricing impacts

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Switzerland’s proposed Corporate Tax Reform III – transfer pricing impacts

habermacher.jpg

klein.jpg

Hans Rudolf Habermacher


Anja Klein

The proposed abolishment of the Swiss holding, mixed and domiciliary company tax regimes within the next five to seven years and the planned introduction of replacement tax measures (for example, the licence box and notional interest deduction) known as the "Swiss Corporate Tax Reform III" has recently sparked some discussions regarding its impact on corporate taxation. It should not be forgotten, though, that this reform will also have significant impacts on transfer pricing arrangements: many MNEs conducting business in Switzerland operate under said tax regimes and from a transfer pricing perspective their abolishment may entail a revision of the underlying business model and transfer pricing set-up to ensure MNEs continue to benefit from favourable taxation levels in Switzerland. The proposed tax reform may require taxpayers to pay more attention to their transfer pricing arrangements. This, however, may provide valid opportunities for companies to optimise their intercompany structures in such a way that they make maximum use of the new structuring possibilities. If implemented, an IP box tax exemption may allow existing companies to significantly reduce the tax rate on royalty income received from foreign affiliated companies or alternatively, a separate licence box company could be created to benefit from such an exemption.

Similarly, the notional interest deduction on equity as currently suggested would be an effective way to reduce a holding company's or mixed company's taxable income in case of a strong equity base. Thus, the new tax reform will allow taxpayers to implement attractive structures through valid transfer pricing, if aligned to the transfer pricing guidelines, as alternatives to the existing preferential Swiss tax regimes.

Hans Rudolf Habermacher (hhabermacher@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 6327
Anja Klein (aklein@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 7245

Deloitte

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Pillar two compliance is creating unprecedented data demands for multinational tax departments, making closer collaboration with FP&A teams essential for accurate reporting and audit readiness
Among the arrivals is Andrew Howell, who leaves scandal-hit PwC Australia after representing PepsiCo in a high-profile TP dispute
ITR's podcast examines whether the big four have overarching cultural issues and assesses the competitive threat of technology-backed transfer pricing firms
The UK advisory firm has seen its global revenues expand by £27.2m following its listing and acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Tax-trained John Sams, previously the firm’s CFO and COO, was appointed after a rigorous process, KPMG said
From Mauritius substance rules to Kenyan SEP tax and South African anti-avoidance measures, businesses must navigate growing scrutiny of cross-border IP structures in Africa
ITR spoke to multinationals, advisers and software providers about a June 30 deadline defined by faulty portals, high compliance costs and hard lessons
After years of onerous pillar two prep, businesses will be galled in seeing tax revenues outweighed by compliance costs
Tax advisers should revisit India secondment arrangements after the EY US ruling strengthened the Centrica precedent and raised fresh withholding concerns
Despite the shortfall, effective tax rates of multinationals have seen a ‘statistically significant rise’
Gift this article