Chile: New penalty tax

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile: New penalty tax

winter.jpg

lecaros.jpg

Rodrigo Winter


Pedro Lecaros

On September 27 2012 Law No. 20.630 was passed in the Chilean Official Gazette. Among other important tax amendments, the law replaced article 21 of the Chilean Income Tax Law, regarding sole penalty tax by a new provision. The instructions related to the application of this article were released on September 23 2013, by means of Circular Letter No. 45/2013 issued by the Chilean IRS. The former provision treated differently certain disallowed disbursements representing cash disbursements depending on the taxpayers' legal structure. In this sense, under the previous law, disallowed expenses in a Stock Corporation (Sociedad Anónima or SA) or sociedad por acciones (SpA) were taxed with a 35% sole penalty tax. On the other hand, disallowed expenses regarding other legal entities were treated as a deemed distribution to the quota holders, taxed accordingly with surtax or additional withholding tax.

New article 21 simplifies the system, equalising the taxation of the disallowed expenses irrespective of the corporate form of the entity of source.

In this sense, new article 21 establishes a 35% tax rate, applicable to disallowed cash disbursements and other kind of disbursements applicable as a sole tax to the entity of source of the disallowed expense. That is to say, after article 21 operates, no further taxation is applied.

Nonetheless, in certain cases, for example in certain disbursements that can be directly linked to a specific share/quotaholder, benefits obtained by the use of the company's assets, among others, such disbursement will be treated as a deemed distribution subject to surtax or additional withholding tax, plus an additional 10% penalty. Therefore, if the owner is a foreign company, 35% additional withholding tax will be triggered plus the additional 10% penalty. On the other hand, if the owner is an individual resident in Chile, he will be subject to surtax, plus the 10% additional penalty.

Rodrigo Winter (rodrigo.winter@cl.pwc.com) and Pedro Lecaros (pedro.lecaros@cl.pwc.com)
PwC

Tel: +56 2 29400588

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

There is a shocking discrepancy between professional services firms’ parental leave packages. Those that fail to get with the times risk losing out in the war for talent
Winston Taylor is expected to launch in May 2026 with more than 1,400 lawyers across the US, UK, Europe, Latin America and the Middle East
They are alleging that leaked tax information ‘unfairly tarnished’ their business operations; in other news, Davis Polk and Eversheds Sutherland made key tax hires
Overall revenues for the combined UK and Swiss firm inched up 2% to £3.6 billion despite a ‘challenging market’
In the first of a two-part series, experts from Khaitan & Co dissect a highly anticipated Indian Supreme Court ruling that marks a decisive shift in India’s international tax jurisprudence
The OECD profile signals Brazil is no longer a jurisdiction where TP can be treated as a mechanical compliance exercise, one expert suggests, though another highlights 'significant concerns'
Libya’s often-overlooked stamp duty can halt payments and freeze contracts, making this quiet tax a decisive hurdle for foreign investors to clear, writes Salaheddin El Busefi
Eugena Cerny shares hard-earned lessons from tax automation projects and explains how to navigate internal roadblocks and miscommunications
The Clifford Chance and Hyatt cases collectively confirm a fundamental principle of international tax law: permanent establishment is a concept based on physical and territorial presence
Australian government minister Andrew Leigh reflects on the fallout of the scandal three years on and looks ahead to regulatory changes
Gift this article