Chile: New penalty tax

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile: New penalty tax

winter.jpg

lecaros.jpg

Rodrigo Winter


Pedro Lecaros

On September 27 2012 Law No. 20.630 was passed in the Chilean Official Gazette. Among other important tax amendments, the law replaced article 21 of the Chilean Income Tax Law, regarding sole penalty tax by a new provision. The instructions related to the application of this article were released on September 23 2013, by means of Circular Letter No. 45/2013 issued by the Chilean IRS. The former provision treated differently certain disallowed disbursements representing cash disbursements depending on the taxpayers' legal structure. In this sense, under the previous law, disallowed expenses in a Stock Corporation (Sociedad Anónima or SA) or sociedad por acciones (SpA) were taxed with a 35% sole penalty tax. On the other hand, disallowed expenses regarding other legal entities were treated as a deemed distribution to the quota holders, taxed accordingly with surtax or additional withholding tax.

New article 21 simplifies the system, equalising the taxation of the disallowed expenses irrespective of the corporate form of the entity of source.

In this sense, new article 21 establishes a 35% tax rate, applicable to disallowed cash disbursements and other kind of disbursements applicable as a sole tax to the entity of source of the disallowed expense. That is to say, after article 21 operates, no further taxation is applied.

Nonetheless, in certain cases, for example in certain disbursements that can be directly linked to a specific share/quotaholder, benefits obtained by the use of the company's assets, among others, such disbursement will be treated as a deemed distribution subject to surtax or additional withholding tax, plus an additional 10% penalty. Therefore, if the owner is a foreign company, 35% additional withholding tax will be triggered plus the additional 10% penalty. On the other hand, if the owner is an individual resident in Chile, he will be subject to surtax, plus the 10% additional penalty.

Rodrigo Winter (rodrigo.winter@cl.pwc.com) and Pedro Lecaros (pedro.lecaros@cl.pwc.com)
PwC

Tel: +56 2 29400588

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While it’s great that the OECD is alive to multinationals’ fears of being caught in a compliance trap, the ‘common understanding’ illustrates a worrying lack of readiness
Rising demand for specialist expertise has fuelled the growth in tax partner headcounts, Cain Dwyer found; in other news, Switzerland has been urged to reconsider pillar two
An OECD report on the taxation of the digital economy is expected by the end of 2026, according to the group of nations
Trophy assets are evolving from personal indulgences to structured investments, prompting family offices to prioritise tax efficiency, governance discipline, and cross-border compliance
As demand for complex, cross-border private client counsel spikes, Patrick McCormick sees opportunity in starting from scratch
As part of an exclusive global alliance, KPMG will become one of Anthropic’s ‘preferred consultants’ for private equity
In the second part of this series, the focus shifts to how taxpayers can manage ongoing risks across the lifecycle of cross-border structures
Jurisdictions have moved to ensure that multinationals are not punished for late GIR filings due to a lack of available filing portals or exchange relationships
HMRC’s push for unified tax adviser registration won’t prevent every instance of improper conduct, but it is good for taxpayers and the UK’s reputation
Elsewhere, the UAE’s tax office has issued an update on registration penalties and two firms have been busy making lateral hires
Gift this article