US Outbound: Fiscal Cliff Bill extends key international tax provisions

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US Outbound: Fiscal Cliff Bill extends key international tax provisions

foley.jpg

mcgrew.jpg

Sean Foley


Landon McGrew

On January 2 2013, President Obama signed into law the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, averting tax elements of the fiscal cliff. In addition to permanently extending the Bush-era tax cuts for individuals with income of less than $400,000 and joint filers with income of less than $450,000, the legislation also temporarily extended two key international tax provisions. These international tax extenders provide important exceptions to the current taxation of a foreign subsidiary's earnings under the subpart F rules.

Subpart F income

In general, US multinationals are not subjected to US tax on the earnings of their foreign subsidiaries until those earnings are repatriated to the US. However, there are certain types of income, such as interest, dividends, rents, and royalties, that are subject to current taxation in the US when earned by a foreign subsidiary under the subpart F rules found in sections 951 through 964 of the Internal Revenue Code. There are a number of exceptions to current taxation under the subpart F rules, including the controlled foreign company (CFC) look-through rule of section 954(c)(6) and the active financing exception of section 954(h). These two exceptions had expired at the end of 2011.

The fiscal cliff extenders

The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 retroactively to January 1 2012 extended the CFC look-through rule of section 954(c)(6) and the active financing exception of section 954(h) to December 31 2013 for calendar year taxpayers. Without these extensions, US multinationals would have been subject to US tax on these types of subpart F income during the 2012 taxable year. A brief description of these two international tax extenders is included below.

Under the CFC look-through rule of section 954(c)(6), dividends, interest, rents, and royalties received by a CFC from another CFC that is a related person (as defined in section 954(d)(3)) are generally excluded from the definition of subpart F income to the extent allocable to income of the related CFC that is not subpart F income. The Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) has estimated that the two-year extension of the CFC look-through rule will cost approximately $1.5 billion over 10 years.

Under the active financing exception of section 954(h), income earned by a foreign subsidiary that is derived from the active conduct of a banking, financing, or similar business is generally excluded from the definition of subpart F income. The JCT has estimated that the extension of the active financing exception will cost approximately $11.2 billion over 10 years.

In light of the extension of these rules, US multinationals should consider revisiting situations where planning may have been deferred or postponed because of the uncertainty of whether these provisions would be further extended. Moreover, given the retroactivity of the legislation, and the fact that the legislation was enacted in January 2013 (and not by the end of 2012), multinationals should also consider its impact on financial accounting.

The information contained herein is of a general nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. Applicability of the information to specific situations should be determined through consultation with your tax adviser.

This article represents the views of the authors only, and does not necessarily represent the views or professional advice of KPMG LLP.

Sean Foley (sffoley@kpmg.com) and Landon McGrew (lmcgrew@kpmg.com), Washington DC

KPMG

Tel: +1 202 533 5588

Fax: +1 202 315 3087

Website: www.us.kpmg.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The boutique Australian firm’s TP award recognition proves that world-class advisory services aren’t limited to the ‘big four’, the firm’s founder tells ITR
Canadian and Indian dual VAT models have been a source of inspiration for the Brazilian model, but the latter has unique and innovative features, the OECD paper claimed
More sophisticated use of technology, heightened TP scrutiny and stricter filing requirements are making South African Revenue Service audits a formidable challenge
The hire of Doug Wick expands Baker McKenzie’s state and local tax practice and adds to the firm’s growing ex-IRS expertise
One year after Nuwaru joined the WTS network, leaders James Jobson and Matthew Missaghi reflect on the firm’s mission to offer mid-tier pricing but deliver top-tier results
Join ITR's Head of Research, John Harrison, for an overview of key dates, new developments, best practices, and more for next year’s research cycle
The president’s tariff regime has already caused misery for taxpayers. Losing at the Supreme Court would mean it was all for nothing
The US itself was the biggest loser of tax revenue to American multinationals’ profit shifting, the Tax Justice Network reported; in other news, firms made key tax hires
Identifying who will bear the costs and concerns around confidentiality are issues yet to be resolved, advisers say
As multinationals embed tax technology into their TP functions, a new breed of systems – built on multi-model databases – is quietly transforming intercompany pricing logic
Gift this article