Beneficial ownership form changes to take account of final FATCA rules

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Beneficial ownership form changes to take account of final FATCA rules

fotoflexer-photofatca.jpg

The new draft of Form W-8BEN-E, which non-US entities must complete for the purposes of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) and other US withholding tax rules, is substantially different from the previous version that came out a year ago, practitioners say.

This is because it needs to be aligned with the final FATCA regulations, which came out in January. The revised form was published by the Internal Revenue Service on May 22.

The overview to the form states that it is for an entity that wants to certify as to its status as beneficial owner or payee of a payment for purposes of chapters 3 - withholding tax rules for non-resident individuals and corporations, and 61 - information and returns, of the Internal Revenue Code, and its status under chapter 4, which contains FATCA, as a payee or account holder of a foreign financial institution (FFI).

  • Part I is for an entity to indicate its status under chapters 3 and 4

  • Part II is only to be completed by certain foreign financial institutions

  • Part III is to be completed only when a beneficial owner of a payment seeks to claim a reduced rate of withholding under an applicable treaty.

  • Parts IV to XXV includes specific certifications relating to the chapter 4 status identified by the entity in Part I. For this portion of the form, the entity is required to complete only that Part covering its applicable chapter 4 status.

Burt Staples & Maner, in Washington DC, point out some of the key changes in the new form:

  • New FATCA classifications from the final regulations and the intergovernmental agreements have been added to the form, and some of the old classifications have been reorganised or combined on line 5. The parts of the form that correspond to the various FATCA classifications also have been revised.

  • The form suggests that entities that provide a global intermediary identification number (GIIN) will not be required to provide a foreign tax identification number. This will have to be confirmed when the instructions are published.

  • New Part II of the form would be completed for a branch or disregarded entity of a foreign financial institution.

  • Passive non-financial foreign enterprises (NFFEs) no longer would be required to report the percentage ownership of their substantial US owners.

  • A beneficial owner would be required to update its form within 30 days of a change that would render a certification on the form incorrect.

  • The signer of the form would no longer be required to state their “capacity” or title on the form, but would be required to check a box certifying that he or she does have the capacity to sign the form.

FATCA became law in March 2010 and requires foreign financial institutions (FFIs) to provide certain information about their US account holders to the US authorities or face a withholding tax of 30%.



more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The streaming company’s operating income was $400m below expectations following the dispute; in other news, the OECD has released updates for 25 TP country profiles
Software company Oracle has won the right to have its A$250m dispute with the ATO stayed, paving the way for a mutual agreement procedure
If the US doesn't participate in pillar two then global consensus on the project can’t be a reality, tax academic René Matteotti also suggests
If it gets pillar two right, India may be the ideal country that finds a balance between its global commitments and its national interests, Sameer Sharma argues
As World Tax unveils its much-anticipated rankings for 2026, we focus on EMEA’s top performers in the first of three regional analyses
Firms are spending serious money to expand their tax advisory practices internationally – this proves that the tax practice is no mere sideshow
The controversial deal would ‘preserve the gains achieved under pillar two’, the OECD said; in other news, HMRC outlined its approach to dealing with ‘harmful’ tax advisers
Former EY and Deloitte tax specialists will staff the new operation, which provides the firm with new offices in Tokyo and Osaka
TP is a growing priority for West and Central African tax authorities, writes Winnie Maliko, but enforcement remains inconsistent, and data limitations persist
The UK tax agency has appointed six independent industry specialists to the panel
Gift this article