France: Appeal Court ruling on the deduction in France of foreign final losses

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

France: Appeal Court ruling on the deduction in France of foreign final losses

taquet.jpg

raingeard.jpg

Jacques Taquet


Emmanuel Raingeard

The administrative appeal court of Versailles rendered a decision on February 26 2013 regarding final losses of foreign subsidiaries of a French company. The Court held that French legislation, which does not allow a French parent to deduct tax losses of EU subsidiaries which the latter cannot carry forward because of local legislation which limit the period for the carryover of tax losses, is actually compatible with EU law. The French taxpayer had offset losses of its Italian and Polish subsidiaries. These losses could not be carried forward locally because of Italian and Polish legislation which limit the period for the carry forward of losses.

The court ruled that the restriction is justified and does not go beyond what is necessary to attain the objectives pursued. The Court seems to imply that the decision would have been different had the losses become "final" following a liquidation of the EU subsidiary.

This decision will probably be examined by the French Supreme Court. This will give an opportunity to clarify the Marks & Spencer (C-446/03) ruling that was recently confirmed in the A Oy case (C-123/11). It seems now clear that where the loss of tax losses results from the liquidation of an enterprise, they can be considered as final losses. On the other hand, the solution is far less clear where tax losses are lost as a result of local legislation which limits the period during which losses can be carried forward.

Jacques Taquet (jacques.taquet@fr.landwellglobal.com)

Tel :+33 1 56 578360

Emmanuel Raingeard (emmanuel.raingeard@fr.landwellglobal.com)

Tel: +33 1 56 574014

Landwell & Associes – member of the PwC network

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s most interesting stories of the year covered ‘landmark’ legal battles, pillar two, AI’s relationship with transfer pricing and more
Chinwe Odimba-Chapman was announced as Michael Bates’ successor; in other news, a report has found a high level of BEPS compliance among OECD jurisdictions
The tool, which will automatically compute amount B returns, requires “only minimal data inputs”, according to the OECD
The rules are intended to implement the substance of an earlier OECD report in its entirety
While new technology won’t replace the human touch, it could help relieve companies’ staffing issues, EY’s David Helmer and Daren Campbell tell ITR
The firm said the financial growth came from increased demand for its AI services and global tax reform advice
Chrystia Freeland had also been the figurehead of Canada’s controversial digital services tax adoption, which stoked economic tensions with the US
Panama has no official position on pillar two so far and a move to implement in Costa Rica will face rejection, experts tell ITR
The KPMG partner tells ITR about Sri Lanka’s complex and evolving tax landscape, setting legal precedents through client work, and his vision for the future of tax
Overall turnover at the firm also reached a record £8 billion; in other news, Ashurst and Dentons announced senior tax partner hires
Gift this article