Editorial

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Editorial

Among the biggest concerns for taxpayers in Europe's capital markets is the question of whether or not a financial transaction tax (FTT) will go ahead and in what form.

Since the European Commission put forward its proposals for an FTT last year, 11 EU member states have signed up to introduce the new tax. Supporters say it will provide vast sums of money with minuscule rates while constraining the kinds of risky transactions that caused the financial crisis. Financial institutions and their advisers, however, fear it will hit Europe's banking sector hard and drive transactions abroad.

There has been much speculation recently over whether the FTT will be watered down or delayed because of rumoured disagreements between member states on its scope.

The latest word from the Commission, however, asserts that the FTT is still on course and discussions are still taking place at a technical level.

"The 11 member states have shown that they are still fully committed to the harmonised approach to the FTT," a Commission spokeswoman told International Tax Review. "Obviously, with such a complex and sensitive proposal, the technical work takes time and there are many different ideas, views and suggestions on how to reach a compromise amongst the 11 member states."

Taxpayers, then, should continue to prepare for the FTT.

The FTT is one of a number of key topics covered in International Tax Review's Capital Markets 2013 supplement, with Ernst & Young writing on its development, its consequences for capital markets, and what changes may be made to the final legislation before it sees adoption.

Another key topic affecting taxpayers in the capital markets this year is the issue of transparency. In this supplement, PwC looks at the new EU tax transparency requirements and the impact they will have on credit institutions.

Also in this supplement we have Taxpartner – Taxand discussing leveraged takeovers in Switzerland, KPMG writing about the Swedish tax implications of insurance-linked securities, and Arthur Cox looking at property investment structures in Ireland.

The last few years have been a difficult time for capital markets. But with plenty of developments on the horizon, we hope you find this supplement a useful guide to the year ahead.

Salman Shaheen

Editor

International Tax Review

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The proposed Block TP Assessment could provide taxpayers with long-term arm’s-length price certainty and reduce admin headaches, Sanjay Sanghvi of Khaitan & Co writes
India’s budget changes goods and services tax rules; UK private school VAT challenge fast-tracked
It is understood that the US has vowed to oppose any outcome from talks taking place at the UN
It’s the second year in a row that RSM’s tax business has posted fee income growth above 10%
Recent guidance from the Indian tax authorities should provide confidence for investors, says Sanjay Sanghvi of Khaitan & Co
Grant Wardell-Johnson also suggests there could be solutions to the friction between the US and the OECD when it comes to pillar two
The president had so far avoided announcing tariffs on the US’s neighbours despite previous threats
The firm brought in three managing directors from EY and Deloitte in Europe; in other news, KPMG’s bid to practise law in US was delayed
One expert argues the ERS would be unlikely to improve taxpayers’ experience unless it comes with additional funding to hire more agents and staff
From pillar two and amount B to Apple’s headline EU Commission dispute, Martin Bonner and Yiwen Ping of Kreston Global argue that 2024’s key TP developments will inform 2025
Gift this article