Editorial

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Editorial

Among the biggest concerns for taxpayers in Europe's capital markets is the question of whether or not a financial transaction tax (FTT) will go ahead and in what form.

Since the European Commission put forward its proposals for an FTT last year, 11 EU member states have signed up to introduce the new tax. Supporters say it will provide vast sums of money with minuscule rates while constraining the kinds of risky transactions that caused the financial crisis. Financial institutions and their advisers, however, fear it will hit Europe's banking sector hard and drive transactions abroad.

There has been much speculation recently over whether the FTT will be watered down or delayed because of rumoured disagreements between member states on its scope.

The latest word from the Commission, however, asserts that the FTT is still on course and discussions are still taking place at a technical level.

"The 11 member states have shown that they are still fully committed to the harmonised approach to the FTT," a Commission spokeswoman told International Tax Review. "Obviously, with such a complex and sensitive proposal, the technical work takes time and there are many different ideas, views and suggestions on how to reach a compromise amongst the 11 member states."

Taxpayers, then, should continue to prepare for the FTT.

The FTT is one of a number of key topics covered in International Tax Review's Capital Markets 2013 supplement, with Ernst & Young writing on its development, its consequences for capital markets, and what changes may be made to the final legislation before it sees adoption.

Another key topic affecting taxpayers in the capital markets this year is the issue of transparency. In this supplement, PwC looks at the new EU tax transparency requirements and the impact they will have on credit institutions.

Also in this supplement we have Taxpartner – Taxand discussing leveraged takeovers in Switzerland, KPMG writing about the Swedish tax implications of insurance-linked securities, and Arthur Cox looking at property investment structures in Ireland.

The last few years have been a difficult time for capital markets. But with plenty of developments on the horizon, we hope you find this supplement a useful guide to the year ahead.

Salman Shaheen

Editor

International Tax Review

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Spain did not transpose EU VAT rules for SMEs or works of art; in other news, an increased VAT threshold came into force in South Africa
While the IBS incorporates taxable events previously covered by state and municipal taxes, its governance and operational logic represent a significant departure from the legacy model
The new office on the fourth floor of 4 More London will span 14,230 square feet, with the potential to expand to the first and second floors
MNEs now face a shift from modelling to execution as the side‑by‑side deal forces tax teams to upgrade systems, harmonise data, and prevent costly pillar two mismatches
As recent surveys suggest a disconnect between AI adoption and employee engagement, the big four risk digging themselves into a strategic hole
Almost three-quarters of surveyed tax professionals are concerned about inaccurate AI outputs; in other news, Dentons hired a partner from CMS to lead its Belgian tax team
Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
Gift this article