Germany: New anti-double-dip-provisions for German tax groups

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: New anti-double-dip-provisions for German tax groups

schanzle.jpg
birker.jpg

Thomas Schänzle

Christian Birker

Parliament has recently enacted a number of important changes to the German tax group (Organschaft) regime. Some of the changes are welcome, particularly those easing and clarifying the formal requirements for Organschaft recognition, but others are problematic. The main instance of this latter are the dual consolidation loss (DCL) rules which now apply not only to the Organschaft parent but, with effect for all open cases, to each and every member. The intention is to combat perceived double-dip arrangements. Under the new wording, a loss of an Organschaft parent or subsidiary is to be disregarded (without carryforward) for German tax purposes to the extent it is taken into account under a foreign tax regime applied to the controlling entity, the controlled entity or any other related or unrelated party. Despite intense debate, there is still uncertainty as to the impact of these new provisions, in particular whether they apply to a German partnership as an Organschaft parent and as to the exact meaning of "losses taken into account" under a foreign tax regime. Apart from interpretive issues raised by the rule's clumsy wording, its retroactive effect probably violates constitutional law. Its conformity with European law is also questionable.

The broad wording of the new DCL rules goes far beyond the legislative intent of thwarting tax planning schemes aimed at a double dip of losses in Germany and abroad. Ordinary German inbound and outbound structures involving a German Organschaft can also be affected, such as where the foreign shareholder deducts a German Organschaft loss under a tax credit system. In such a case, the disallowance of German Organschaft losses may result in an effective double taxation.

Existing German Organschaft structures should be carefully reviewed as timely measures may have to be taken to avoid or mitigate adverse German tax consequences under the new DCL rules.

Thomas Schänzle (thomas.schaenzle@de.pwc.com)

Tel: +49 69 9585 6477
Christian Birker (christian.birker@de.pwc.com)

Tel: +49 69 9585 6061

PwC

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

It is understood that the US has vowed to oppose any outcome from talks taking place at the UN
It’s the second year in a row that RSM’s tax business has posted fee income growth above 10%
Recent guidance from the Indian tax authorities should provide confidence for investors, says Sanjay Sanghvi of Khaitan & Co
Grant Wardell-Johnson also suggests there could be solutions to the friction between the US and the OECD when it comes to pillar two
The president had so far avoided announcing tariffs on the US’s neighbours despite previous threats
The firm brought in three managing directors from EY and Deloitte in Europe; in other news, KPMG’s bid to practise law in US was delayed
One expert argues the ERS would be unlikely to improve taxpayers’ experience unless it comes with additional funding to hire more agents and staff
From pillar two and amount B to Apple’s headline EU Commission dispute, Martin Bonner and Yiwen Ping of Kreston Global argue that 2024’s key TP developments will inform 2025
Holland & Knight, Nelson Mullins and McCarter & English made the joint-most tax partner hires in the US last year, according to annual ITR Talent Tracker data
Despite a three-year-high in tax revenues generated from settling TP cases, HMRC reported a sharp fall in resolved MAP disputes
Gift this article