Marlies de Ruiter

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Marlies de Ruiter

Head of the OECD's Tax Treaty, Transfer Pricing and Financial Transactions division

Marlies de Ruiter

Marlies de Ruiter has been nominated this year for her work connected to the OECD’s Revised Proposals on Article 5 (permanent establishment) of the OECD Model Tax Convention, as head of the Tax Treaties, Transfer Pricing and Financial Transactions Division.

The interpretation of PE is evolving as business adapts to a more global environment. Technological advancements, more tax treaties and the realities of business transactions mean the definition of PE is changing.

The OECD does not think the guidelines cater for the way companies and government now define PE.

Based on the current draft, however, some concerns are still being raised.

Queries have been raised over the mention in the draft of “space at the disposal of”, because the notion of “having the power to use” a location is difficult to apply, if, as suggested during the OECD consultation meeting, it means something less than a legal right to use a location.

“While the first example given by the OECD, at proposed paragraph 4.2 (exclusive legal right to use or legal possession), is quite straightforward, the second one, which deals with an enterprise being “allowed to use” a location where it performs its business activities on a continuous basis during an extended period of time, is not nearly as limpid,” says Francois Vincent of KPMG in France.

“More specifically, it becomes difficult to delineate how being allowed to use space is equal to having the power to use that space; unless “being allowed” means being conferred the power to use that space, under something like a formal authorisation - which may come pretty close to a legal right to use - rather than passive acceptance of the use of space; which was part of the original concern expressed by BIAC that led to the recommendation to replace existing paragraph 4.2,” Vincent adds.

In June 2013, the OECD Committee on Fiscal Affairs released for public comment a discussion draft on the tax treatment of various payments that may be made following the termination of an employment, as part of the changes to permanent establishment. These comments have now been posted online and are being considered by de Ruiter and her team.

The Global Tax 50 2013

« Previous

Tim Cook and Eric Schmidt

View the complete list

Next »

Tara Ferris

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

India also brokered its first-ever multilateral APA last year, the Central Board of Taxes announced
A global tax framework may not materialise anytime soon, but a common set of principles is becoming increasingly necessary, Rudolf Winkenius also tells ITR
Kingsley Napley’s claimants are arguing that taxing the provision of education breaches the European Convention on Human Rights
While pillar two can progress without the US, it won’t reach the same heights without American involvement, argues Renáta Bláhová, founding partner of BMB Partners Taxand
There are unanswered questions as to how foreign investors could reclaim money via tax credits, advisers suggested
Amid an ever-changing tax environment, India’s advisory market is bustling with competition ahead of the 2025 World Tax rankings and ITR Awards
The deal comes after PwC had accused Paul McNab of using confidential information; in other news, McDermott hired a new London tax head from a US rival
Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Gift this article